Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines
From Amazon.com:
Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines: The Truth Behind a Tragedy
Andrew J. Wakefield (Author)
Jenny McCarthy (Foreword)
List Price: $26.95
Price: $17.43 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $9.52 (35%)
Kindle Edition $14.82
Hardcover: http://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disregard-Autism-Vaccines-Tragedy/dp/1616081694/thekonformist
Kindle: http://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disregard-Vaccines-Tragedy-ebook/dp/B003QHYU2S/thekonformist
Editorial Reviews
"I'm so glad Andy Wakefield finally has the chance to tell his story. . . . For hundreds of thousands of parents around the world, myself included, Andy Wakefield is a symbol of strength and conviction that all parents of children with autism can use to fight for truth and the best lives possible for their kids."
----Jenny McCarthy, from her foreword
"Dr. Wakefield sets the record straight. It was not he who showed callous disregard towards vulnerable, sick children with autism. It was the British medical establishment, the General Medical Council, the media and the pharmaceutical industry that threw the children under the bus to protect the vaccine program. This is a book for everyone who cares about our future."
----Mary Holland, Esq., Co-founder, Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law and Advocacy
"Andrew Wakefield has been subjected to extraordinary criticism and condemnation from professional colleagues and the wider community since he first questioned the safety of the MMR vaccine. In this book he answers his critics--powerfully and comprehensively---and sets the record straight. It is essential reading for anyone wanting to know the truth behind the MMR debate and the politics of vaccination policy."
----Dr. Richard Halvorsen, author of "The Truth about Vaccines"
"As a mother of a boy who regressed into autism immediately following his MMR vaccination, I welcome this book unreservedly . . . Whatever your thoughts on the issue, if you read nothing else at all on the vaccine-autism debate, this has to be the most crucial book you read."
----Polly Tommey, Editor-in-Chief, "The Autism File"
"Meeting Dr. Andy Wakefield changed our lives and . . . we are forever grateful. His wise and measured advice about vaccinations helped us dodge a bullet . . . Our fourth son [had] multiple allergies and repeated infections . . . We now fully realize [he] would have been a victim of immune overload had we followed the regular vaccine schedule. . . . [He] is [now] bright and healthy . . . This book provides a terrifying insight into what has been happening behind the scenes as efforts redouble to silence Dr. Wakefield . . . It is a wake-up call to those who think [he] is anything other than a modern day hero fighting for all of our children."
----Robert Rodriguez and Elizabeth Avellan, Troublemaker Studios, Austin, Texas
Andrew Wakefield reveals the the inside story of the vaccine-autism connection, and his controversial research. As Andrew Wakefield states in his prologue, “If autism does not affect your family now, it will. If something does not change—and change soon—this is almost a mathematical certainty. This book affects you also. It is not a parochial look at a trivial medical spat in the United Kingdom, but dispatches from the battlefront in a major confrontation—a struggle against compromise in medicine, corruption of science, and a real and present threat to children in the interests of policy and profit. It is a story of how ‘the system’ deals with dissent among its doctors and scientists.”
In the pursuit of possible links between childhood vaccines, intestinal inflammation, and neurologic injury in children, Wakefield lost his job in London’s Royal Free Hospital, his country of birth, his career, and his medical license. A recent General Medical Council ruling stated that he was “dishonest, irresponsible and showed callous disregard for the distress and pain of children.” Maligned by the medical establishment and mainstream media, Wakefield endeavors to set the record straight in Callous Disregard. While explaining what really happened, he calls out the organizations and individuals that are acting not for the sake of children affected by autism, but in their own self-interests.
About the Author
Andrew J. Wakefield, MB, BS, FRCS, FRCPath, is an academic gastroenterologist. He received his medical degree from St. Mary’s Hospital Medical School (part of the University of London) in 1981, and pursued a career in gastrointestinal surgery with a particular interest in inflammatory bowel disease. He has published over 130 original scientific articles, book chapters, and invited scientific commentaries. He and his wife, Carmel, live in Austin, Texas, and have four children: James, Sam, Imogen, and Corin.
Jenny McCarthy is a world-renowned autism activist, mother, and bestselling author. She splits her time between Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, and California. Her books include Belly Laughs, Baby Laughs, Life Laughs, Mother Warriors, Healing and Preventing Autism, and Louder Than Words.
Product Details
Hardcover: 288 pages
Publisher: Skyhorse Publishing (May 24, 2010)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1616081694
ISBN-13: 978-1616081690
It’s All Just Coincidental
On the 20th of January 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said there have been 36 confirmed reports of seizures this flu season in children ages 6 months through 2 years in the United States. The seizures occurred within one day after they were vaccinated with Fluzone, the only flu shot recommended in America for infants and very young children. Ten of the children were hospitalized. The vaccine’s manufacturer, Sanofi Pasteur, issued a statement emphasizing that no clear link has been established between the flu shot and the seizures and that the cases may be coincidental.
Only vaccine manufacturers have the gall to say something like that but they get away with it. We have been had on a grand scale by the pharmaceutical industry just as we have been had by medical officials around the globe who treat the rest of us like idiots every time they even open up their mouths about anything to do with vaccines.
Way back at the end of July of 2010 Mike Adams was shouting, “Vaccine pushers have always sworn their vaccines caused no seizures whatsoever. No neurological problems. No spontaneous abortions in pregnant women. No increased rates of autism. Vaccines are all perfectly safe, they say, and no children are ever harmed by them. That’s the mythology, at least, behind vaccines. But the reality is far different: Vaccines do cause seizures in children, and this year’s vaccines look like they’re going to cause a significantly higher rate of seizures than usual.”
And now we read in the papers that Adams was correct. Children have been hurt and it’s out in the papers for everyone to see. Governmental medical and health officials, the American Academy of Pediatricians, and doctors around the country only had to listen but this is too much for their minds to handle. They would rather inject than listen and that makes them awful doctors. They prove to be Neanderthals when it comes to listening to anything other than the propaganda and false hype that surrounds the world of childhood immunization. It does not take much intelligence to follow the herd in lockstep believing only what we are supposed to believe. We don’t expect religious leaders to listen to anything but their own religious doctrine and we shouldn’t expect anything better from orthodox baby doctors either. They are that dogmatic. They are that closed, blind and arrogant.
Most of us are too numb to feel much about these kids and their families and the hordes of autism and other developmentally-impaired children. We are too numb to feel for the homeless and the people we pass on the streets who have lost everything. We are also too numb about the constant wars and the absolutely retarded reasons for them. So we become so weak that most of us cannot even protect our children from medical terrorists who feel like all terrorists do—their cause is right; their reasoning is sound. So they stock their cabinets with chemically dangerous vaccines and charge right into herds of kids no matter what is reported, even in the mainstream press.
We have become cruel in our coldness and indifference. Life has conspired against us leaving us feeling helpless and defenseless. Some though fight with words and scream against the terrorism of the system and the people that run it. We point our fingers, but are we willing to fundamentally change ourselves? That’s really tough, as everyone knows —it has been said that it is easier to conquer the world than oneself. Certainly mainstream pediatricians find it easier to scare parents and attack babies than it is for them to listen to other doctors, medical researchers, chemists and even parents who are crying for the madness to stop.
It really is hard to buck the system so most people still allow their children to be vaccinated and then they cry later kicking themselves for allowing their children to be hurt. Heartless and spineless pediatricians continue their onslaught and drive home in their Mercedes. It really is no contest who is worse—the thieves on Wall Street who are destroying life as we know it or the pediatricians in their white coats who attack children with their arrogance. People are rallying against the banksters, but who is rallying directly against the field of pediatrics?
I saw a movie tonight that was the strangest I have ever seen. The main character lived a totally psychotic lie rather than facing his reality. Even with the help of psychiatrists who were really trying to help him, and even when he did see what he had done, he chose the lie even if it meant having a frontal lobotomy.
Orthodox card-carrying American Pediatric Association physicians are much the same. They refuse to look, they refuse to pay attention, they refuse to understand the hurt, damage and misery they are creating as they continue to attack children with their sometimes-deadly vaccines.
It takes extraordinary courage today to have children and to protect them from the harm that is intentionally directed at them. It takes courage to even read this book because one has to bear the pain of what is happening and what is being done to the children. One cannot talk about Humane Pediatrics without learning and studying inhumane pediatrics. It is really a very bad mirror on our humanity that we have allowed the worst kind of arrogance to take over the field of pediatrics and let them roam free amongst our children. Catholics have learned the hard way, having allowed way too many children to be sexually abused by celibate sexually-repressed priests. And the rest of us have allowed an exponentially greater number of children to be chemically abused by the “priests” we find everywhere in the field of pediatrics.
In the next week I will race like mad to finish my book Humane Pediatrics and I will pray that it gets into enough hands to make a difference. Pediatricians can learn from it and pediatrics can evolve into a form of medicine that cares more for the children than for the medical ideas born out of arrogance and pharmaceutical terrorism. I hope many will join with me in the fight to bring humaneness back to the medical treatment of our young.
Today is a sad day for parents because under the care of modern pediatrics, children have never been sicker emotionally, mentally and physically. Is there a humane pediatrician in the house?
People who are new to my work should not wait for the month it will take to actually get the book finished and formatted first into e-book form and then as quickly as possible into print. I suggest that parents and doctors read my important books: Sodium Bicarbonate, which is a full medical review as well as a cancer treatment book, Transdermal Magnesium Therapy (second edition due out in paperback in a few weeks), my book on Iodine as well as my book, Natural Allopathic Medicine. Each one contains information essential for the practice of Humane Pediatrics.
Mark Sircus Ac., OMD
Director International Medical Veritas Association
http://publications.imva.info/
http://blog.imva.info/
Legal Notice: The Author specifically invokes the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press without prejudice. The information written is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America, and should not in any way be used as a substitute for the advice of a physician or other licensed health care practitioner. The statements contained herein have not been evaluated by the FDA. The products discussed herein are not intended to diagnose, cure, prevent or treat any disease. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this essay may be reproduced except by written consent. ©2010 by Mark Sircus
Our mailing address is:
IMVA
Av. Epitácio Pessoa
2234
João Pessoa, Paraiba 58040-000
Only vaccine manufacturers have the gall to say something like that but they get away with it. We have been had on a grand scale by the pharmaceutical industry just as we have been had by medical officials around the globe who treat the rest of us like idiots every time they even open up their mouths about anything to do with vaccines.
Way back at the end of July of 2010 Mike Adams was shouting, “Vaccine pushers have always sworn their vaccines caused no seizures whatsoever. No neurological problems. No spontaneous abortions in pregnant women. No increased rates of autism. Vaccines are all perfectly safe, they say, and no children are ever harmed by them. That’s the mythology, at least, behind vaccines. But the reality is far different: Vaccines do cause seizures in children, and this year’s vaccines look like they’re going to cause a significantly higher rate of seizures than usual.”
And now we read in the papers that Adams was correct. Children have been hurt and it’s out in the papers for everyone to see. Governmental medical and health officials, the American Academy of Pediatricians, and doctors around the country only had to listen but this is too much for their minds to handle. They would rather inject than listen and that makes them awful doctors. They prove to be Neanderthals when it comes to listening to anything other than the propaganda and false hype that surrounds the world of childhood immunization. It does not take much intelligence to follow the herd in lockstep believing only what we are supposed to believe. We don’t expect religious leaders to listen to anything but their own religious doctrine and we shouldn’t expect anything better from orthodox baby doctors either. They are that dogmatic. They are that closed, blind and arrogant.
Most of us are too numb to feel much about these kids and their families and the hordes of autism and other developmentally-impaired children. We are too numb to feel for the homeless and the people we pass on the streets who have lost everything. We are also too numb about the constant wars and the absolutely retarded reasons for them. So we become so weak that most of us cannot even protect our children from medical terrorists who feel like all terrorists do—their cause is right; their reasoning is sound. So they stock their cabinets with chemically dangerous vaccines and charge right into herds of kids no matter what is reported, even in the mainstream press.
We have become cruel in our coldness and indifference. Life has conspired against us leaving us feeling helpless and defenseless. Some though fight with words and scream against the terrorism of the system and the people that run it. We point our fingers, but are we willing to fundamentally change ourselves? That’s really tough, as everyone knows —it has been said that it is easier to conquer the world than oneself. Certainly mainstream pediatricians find it easier to scare parents and attack babies than it is for them to listen to other doctors, medical researchers, chemists and even parents who are crying for the madness to stop.
It really is hard to buck the system so most people still allow their children to be vaccinated and then they cry later kicking themselves for allowing their children to be hurt. Heartless and spineless pediatricians continue their onslaught and drive home in their Mercedes. It really is no contest who is worse—the thieves on Wall Street who are destroying life as we know it or the pediatricians in their white coats who attack children with their arrogance. People are rallying against the banksters, but who is rallying directly against the field of pediatrics?
I saw a movie tonight that was the strangest I have ever seen. The main character lived a totally psychotic lie rather than facing his reality. Even with the help of psychiatrists who were really trying to help him, and even when he did see what he had done, he chose the lie even if it meant having a frontal lobotomy.
Orthodox card-carrying American Pediatric Association physicians are much the same. They refuse to look, they refuse to pay attention, they refuse to understand the hurt, damage and misery they are creating as they continue to attack children with their sometimes-deadly vaccines.
It takes extraordinary courage today to have children and to protect them from the harm that is intentionally directed at them. It takes courage to even read this book because one has to bear the pain of what is happening and what is being done to the children. One cannot talk about Humane Pediatrics without learning and studying inhumane pediatrics. It is really a very bad mirror on our humanity that we have allowed the worst kind of arrogance to take over the field of pediatrics and let them roam free amongst our children. Catholics have learned the hard way, having allowed way too many children to be sexually abused by celibate sexually-repressed priests. And the rest of us have allowed an exponentially greater number of children to be chemically abused by the “priests” we find everywhere in the field of pediatrics.
In the next week I will race like mad to finish my book Humane Pediatrics and I will pray that it gets into enough hands to make a difference. Pediatricians can learn from it and pediatrics can evolve into a form of medicine that cares more for the children than for the medical ideas born out of arrogance and pharmaceutical terrorism. I hope many will join with me in the fight to bring humaneness back to the medical treatment of our young.
Today is a sad day for parents because under the care of modern pediatrics, children have never been sicker emotionally, mentally and physically. Is there a humane pediatrician in the house?
People who are new to my work should not wait for the month it will take to actually get the book finished and formatted first into e-book form and then as quickly as possible into print. I suggest that parents and doctors read my important books: Sodium Bicarbonate, which is a full medical review as well as a cancer treatment book, Transdermal Magnesium Therapy (second edition due out in paperback in a few weeks), my book on Iodine as well as my book, Natural Allopathic Medicine. Each one contains information essential for the practice of Humane Pediatrics.
Mark Sircus Ac., OMD
Director International Medical Veritas Association
http://publications.imva.info/
http://blog.imva.info/
Legal Notice: The Author specifically invokes the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press without prejudice. The information written is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America, and should not in any way be used as a substitute for the advice of a physician or other licensed health care practitioner. The statements contained herein have not been evaluated by the FDA. The products discussed herein are not intended to diagnose, cure, prevent or treat any disease. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this essay may be reproduced except by written consent. ©2010 by Mark Sircus
Our mailing address is:
IMVA
Av. Epitácio Pessoa
2234
João Pessoa, Paraiba 58040-000
In the Vaccine-Autism Debate, What Can Parents Believe?
Jenny McCarthy
Author, model and autism activist
January 10, 2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jenny-mccarthy/vaccine-autism-debate_b_806857.html
Andrew Wakefield , Autism , Autism And Vaccines , Autism Vaccine , Autism Vaccine Debate , Autism Vaccine Link , Autism/Vaccine Debate , Huffington Post Jenny Mccarthy , Jenny McCarthy , Jenny McCarthy Autism , Jenny McCarthy Autism Vaccine , Health News
Last week, parents were told a British researcher's 1998 report linking the MMR shot to autism was fraudulent -- that this debate about vaccines and autism is now over, and parents should no longer worry about giving their children six vaccines at a single pediatric appointment or 36 by the time they are five years old.
Is that the whole story? Dr. Andrew Wakefield's study of 12 children with autism actually looked at bowel disease, not vaccines. The study's conclusion stated, "We did not prove an association between measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described [autism]."
Dr. Wakefield did something I wish all doctors would do: he listened to parents and reported what they said. His paper also said that, "Onset of behavioral symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps and rubella vaccination in 8 of the 12 children," and that, "further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome [autism with gut disease] and its possible relation to this vaccine."
Since when is repeating the words of parents and recommending further investigation a crime? As I've learned, the answer is whenever someone questions the safety of any vaccines.
For some reason, parents aren't being told that this "new" information about Dr. Wakefield isn't a medical report, but merely the allegations of a single British journalist named Brian Deer. Why does one journalist's accusations against Dr. Wakefield now mean the vaccine-autism debate is over?
One of the actual parents from the study, who talked to Generation Rescue, wondered the same thing:
How could the BMJ [British Medical Journal, publisher of Brian Deer's article] scrutinize what Brian Deer has said without looking at our children's medical notes which they are not allowed to have? This needs to be challenged.
Another parent of one of the 12 children put things even more strongly:
To hear that my son's gastrointestinal condition has been extensively refuted, by unqualified and ill-informed individuals who have never laid eyes on him, looking at and mis-interpreting scanty medical notes without the courtesy to ask for our version of our son's early childhood, flies in the face of everything that the medical community and its professional bodies seek to represent. This is especially curious as gastrointestinal issues in autism are well recognized and documented and are included in the UK government's own best practice guidelines for early investigation and treatment.
American media, why aren't we hearing from these parents? If Brian Deer's allegations are actually false, if the Lancet 12 parents stand with Dr. Wakefield, then what exactly are moms and dads supposed to think about last week's media circus?
I know children regress after vaccination because it happened to my own son. Why aren't there any tests out there on the safety of how vaccines are administered in the real world, six at a time? Why have only 2 of the 36 shots our kids receive been looked at for their relationship to autism? Why hasn't anyone ever studied completely non-vaccinated children to understand their autism rate?
These missing safety studies are causing many parents to approach vaccines with moderation. Why do other first world countries give children so many fewer vaccines than we do? What if a parent used the vaccine schedule of Denmark, Norway, Japan or Finland -- countries that give one-third the shots we do (12 shots vs. 36 in the U.S.)? Vaccines save lives, but might be harming some children -- is moderation such a terrible idea?
This debate won't end because of one dubious reporter's allegations. I have never met stronger women than the moms of children with autism. Last week, this hoopla made us a little stronger, and even more determined to fight for the truth about what's happening to our kids.
Author, model and autism activist
January 10, 2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jenny-mccarthy/vaccine-autism-debate_b_806857.html
Andrew Wakefield , Autism , Autism And Vaccines , Autism Vaccine , Autism Vaccine Debate , Autism Vaccine Link , Autism/Vaccine Debate , Huffington Post Jenny Mccarthy , Jenny McCarthy , Jenny McCarthy Autism , Jenny McCarthy Autism Vaccine , Health News
Last week, parents were told a British researcher's 1998 report linking the MMR shot to autism was fraudulent -- that this debate about vaccines and autism is now over, and parents should no longer worry about giving their children six vaccines at a single pediatric appointment or 36 by the time they are five years old.
Is that the whole story? Dr. Andrew Wakefield's study of 12 children with autism actually looked at bowel disease, not vaccines. The study's conclusion stated, "We did not prove an association between measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described [autism]."
Dr. Wakefield did something I wish all doctors would do: he listened to parents and reported what they said. His paper also said that, "Onset of behavioral symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps and rubella vaccination in 8 of the 12 children," and that, "further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome [autism with gut disease] and its possible relation to this vaccine."
Since when is repeating the words of parents and recommending further investigation a crime? As I've learned, the answer is whenever someone questions the safety of any vaccines.
For some reason, parents aren't being told that this "new" information about Dr. Wakefield isn't a medical report, but merely the allegations of a single British journalist named Brian Deer. Why does one journalist's accusations against Dr. Wakefield now mean the vaccine-autism debate is over?
One of the actual parents from the study, who talked to Generation Rescue, wondered the same thing:
How could the BMJ [British Medical Journal, publisher of Brian Deer's article] scrutinize what Brian Deer has said without looking at our children's medical notes which they are not allowed to have? This needs to be challenged.
Another parent of one of the 12 children put things even more strongly:
To hear that my son's gastrointestinal condition has been extensively refuted, by unqualified and ill-informed individuals who have never laid eyes on him, looking at and mis-interpreting scanty medical notes without the courtesy to ask for our version of our son's early childhood, flies in the face of everything that the medical community and its professional bodies seek to represent. This is especially curious as gastrointestinal issues in autism are well recognized and documented and are included in the UK government's own best practice guidelines for early investigation and treatment.
American media, why aren't we hearing from these parents? If Brian Deer's allegations are actually false, if the Lancet 12 parents stand with Dr. Wakefield, then what exactly are moms and dads supposed to think about last week's media circus?
I know children regress after vaccination because it happened to my own son. Why aren't there any tests out there on the safety of how vaccines are administered in the real world, six at a time? Why have only 2 of the 36 shots our kids receive been looked at for their relationship to autism? Why hasn't anyone ever studied completely non-vaccinated children to understand their autism rate?
These missing safety studies are causing many parents to approach vaccines with moderation. Why do other first world countries give children so many fewer vaccines than we do? What if a parent used the vaccine schedule of Denmark, Norway, Japan or Finland -- countries that give one-third the shots we do (12 shots vs. 36 in the U.S.)? Vaccines save lives, but might be harming some children -- is moderation such a terrible idea?
This debate won't end because of one dubious reporter's allegations. I have never met stronger women than the moms of children with autism. Last week, this hoopla made us a little stronger, and even more determined to fight for the truth about what's happening to our kids.
Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ
Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ after documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
http://www.naturalnews.com/031117_BMJ_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield.html
(NaturalNews) In light of new evidence that has emerged clearing Dr Wakefield of the allegations that he fabricated study data involving MMR vaccines and symptoms of autism, Dr Wakefield is now publicly demanding a retraction from the British Medical Journal and author Brian Deer. Documents just made public reveal that another medical research team which included a senior pathologist independently documented evidence of a possible MMR vaccine - autism link 14 months before Dr Wakefield's paper first appears in The Lancet -- based on several of the same children appearing in Dr Wakefield's study.
These documents include detailed clinical notes describing the pathology in seven children following MMR vaccination. These notes include references to "autism" and chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, among others.
This evidence, which was just made public, refutes the accusations of fraud leveled against Dr Andrew Wakefield by the British Medical Journal and reporter Brian Deer. This evidence was made available to the BMJ before the publication of their accusations, but they chose to ignore it. Dr Wakefield, in essence, has been falsely accused by the BMJ in what is now being widely recognized as a political witch hunt against the most visible researcher questioning the safety of MMR vaccines.
BMJ caught in highly politicized scientific fraud
The BMJ, in essence, has been caught pulling off what may be the largest scientific fraud ever perpetrated by any medical journal in the history of the world. It grossly misrepresented the facts in falsely accusing Dr Wakefield of fabricating the clinical trial data that led to his landmark study being published in The Lancet in 1998. The innocence of Dr Wakefield has now been established by these newly-released documents.
The British Medical Journal also failed to disclose that its own finances are largely funded by vaccine manufacturers who fill the journal with paid advertising, and that such financial ties may have influenced the journal's decision to attempt to destroy the reputation of a researcher whose findings threatened the profits of its top sponsors. If you follow the money in this story, in other words, it leads right to the editors of BMJ, whose salaries are effectively financed by vaccine manufacturers. This all-important conflict of interest is almost never discussed in the mainstream media, by the way.
In light of the evidence that has now been made public, clearing Dr Andrew Wakefield of any wrongdoing, Dr Wakefield is publicly demanding that the BMJ issue a full retraction of its Brian Deer article accusing Dr Wakefield of fabricating the data. His statement is entitled, "Uncovered Documents Prove There Was No Fraud in Lancet Case Series" and is included here in its entirety:
STATEMENT BY DR. ANDREW WAKEFIELD
Uncovered Documents Prove There Was No Fraud in Lancet Case Series
British Medical Journal and Sunday Times author Brian Deer misrepresent facts in latest articles wrongly accusing Dr. Wakefield of altering clinical histories of autistic children
In a series of articles published in the UK Sunday Times and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), written by freelance journalist Brian Deer and BMJ editor Dr. Fiona Godlee, I am accused of altering the clinical histories and test results in autistic children in order to manufacture a novel disease – a disease described in The Lancet in 1998 that Brian Deer claims does not exist. I have documents that confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that I did not falsify this data; that the finding of bowel disease in these children is real; and that these findings were accurately reported in The Lancet in 1998.
The first document describes 7 of The Lancet children and was written by Professor John Walker-Smith in December 1996, 14 months before The Lancet paper was published. Professor Walker-Smith prepared this document in an exercise that, in his words, “was totally unrelated to Andy Wakefield”. The document was a report prepared for a scientific meeting, and was based upon Professor Walker-Smith’s own independent assessment of the children’s condition.
He was assisted by a senior pathologist and an expert in bowel disease, Dr. Dhillon, who reported on the microscopic findings in the children’s intestinal tissues. This independent analysis was conducted to a high level of scientific rigor, and are the precise findings reported in The Lancet.
These documents, including Professor Walker-Smith’s report; the transcript of his sworn testimony before the UK medical regulator (2), the General Medical Council (GMC), and the relevant sections of the statement of Dr. Dhillon to the GMC3; were available to Deer and the editors of the BMJ well in advance of their recent publication. They knew, or should have known, that their allegations against me were false. It is clear that the BMJ acted recklessly by failing to check these facts adequately before making their false allegations.
On the basis of this evidence, the British Medical Journal must retract these articles, or face the consequences.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
http://www.naturalnews.com/031117_BMJ_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield.html
(NaturalNews) In light of new evidence that has emerged clearing Dr Wakefield of the allegations that he fabricated study data involving MMR vaccines and symptoms of autism, Dr Wakefield is now publicly demanding a retraction from the British Medical Journal and author Brian Deer. Documents just made public reveal that another medical research team which included a senior pathologist independently documented evidence of a possible MMR vaccine - autism link 14 months before Dr Wakefield's paper first appears in The Lancet -- based on several of the same children appearing in Dr Wakefield's study.
These documents include detailed clinical notes describing the pathology in seven children following MMR vaccination. These notes include references to "autism" and chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, among others.
This evidence, which was just made public, refutes the accusations of fraud leveled against Dr Andrew Wakefield by the British Medical Journal and reporter Brian Deer. This evidence was made available to the BMJ before the publication of their accusations, but they chose to ignore it. Dr Wakefield, in essence, has been falsely accused by the BMJ in what is now being widely recognized as a political witch hunt against the most visible researcher questioning the safety of MMR vaccines.
BMJ caught in highly politicized scientific fraud
The BMJ, in essence, has been caught pulling off what may be the largest scientific fraud ever perpetrated by any medical journal in the history of the world. It grossly misrepresented the facts in falsely accusing Dr Wakefield of fabricating the clinical trial data that led to his landmark study being published in The Lancet in 1998. The innocence of Dr Wakefield has now been established by these newly-released documents.
The British Medical Journal also failed to disclose that its own finances are largely funded by vaccine manufacturers who fill the journal with paid advertising, and that such financial ties may have influenced the journal's decision to attempt to destroy the reputation of a researcher whose findings threatened the profits of its top sponsors. If you follow the money in this story, in other words, it leads right to the editors of BMJ, whose salaries are effectively financed by vaccine manufacturers. This all-important conflict of interest is almost never discussed in the mainstream media, by the way.
In light of the evidence that has now been made public, clearing Dr Andrew Wakefield of any wrongdoing, Dr Wakefield is publicly demanding that the BMJ issue a full retraction of its Brian Deer article accusing Dr Wakefield of fabricating the data. His statement is entitled, "Uncovered Documents Prove There Was No Fraud in Lancet Case Series" and is included here in its entirety:
STATEMENT BY DR. ANDREW WAKEFIELD
Uncovered Documents Prove There Was No Fraud in Lancet Case Series
British Medical Journal and Sunday Times author Brian Deer misrepresent facts in latest articles wrongly accusing Dr. Wakefield of altering clinical histories of autistic children
In a series of articles published in the UK Sunday Times and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), written by freelance journalist Brian Deer and BMJ editor Dr. Fiona Godlee, I am accused of altering the clinical histories and test results in autistic children in order to manufacture a novel disease – a disease described in The Lancet in 1998 that Brian Deer claims does not exist. I have documents that confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that I did not falsify this data; that the finding of bowel disease in these children is real; and that these findings were accurately reported in The Lancet in 1998.
The first document describes 7 of The Lancet children and was written by Professor John Walker-Smith in December 1996, 14 months before The Lancet paper was published. Professor Walker-Smith prepared this document in an exercise that, in his words, “was totally unrelated to Andy Wakefield”. The document was a report prepared for a scientific meeting, and was based upon Professor Walker-Smith’s own independent assessment of the children’s condition.
He was assisted by a senior pathologist and an expert in bowel disease, Dr. Dhillon, who reported on the microscopic findings in the children’s intestinal tissues. This independent analysis was conducted to a high level of scientific rigor, and are the precise findings reported in The Lancet.
These documents, including Professor Walker-Smith’s report; the transcript of his sworn testimony before the UK medical regulator (2), the General Medical Council (GMC), and the relevant sections of the statement of Dr. Dhillon to the GMC3; were available to Deer and the editors of the BMJ well in advance of their recent publication. They knew, or should have known, that their allegations against me were false. It is clear that the BMJ acted recklessly by failing to check these facts adequately before making their false allegations.
On the basis of this evidence, the British Medical Journal must retract these articles, or face the consequences.
Documents emerge proving Dr Andrew Wakefield innocent
Documents emerge proving Dr Andrew Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Brian Deer caught misrepresenting the facts
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html
(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Andrew Wakefield of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its reporter Brian Deer. This new evidence "completely negates the allegations that I committed scientific fraud. Brian Deer and Dr. Godlee of the British Medical Journal (BMJ) knew or should have known about the facts set out below before publishing their false allegations," says Dr Andrew Wakefield.
Newly-revealed documents show that on December 20th, 1996, a meeting of The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School featured a presentation by Professor Walker-Smith on seven of the children who would later become part of the group of patients Dr Wakefield wrote about in his 1998 The Lancet paper (which was later retracted by The Lancet).
Remember, Dr Wakefield has been accused of completely fabricating his findings about these same children in his 1998 paper, but these documents reveal that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two other researchers -- Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Amar Dhillon -- independently documented the same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.
Thus, Dr Wakefield could not have "fabricated" these findings as alleged by the British Medical Journal, which now finds itself in the position of needing to issue a retraction, or it must now expand its accusations of fraud to include Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Dhillon... essentially, the BMJ must now insist that a "conspiracy of fraud" existed among at least these three researchers, and possibly more, in order to back up its allegation that Dr Wakefield's study results were fabricated.
The smoking-gun evidence
Professor Walker-Smith's 1996 presentation at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School was entitled, "Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR - A Review of the First Seven Cases."
His presentation notes began with the following text: "“I wish today, to present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly present their case history [sic]."
He then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar Dhillon. Importantly, Dr Andrew Wakefield was not part of this investigation. This means that Dr Wakefield's findings were independently replicated by another medical research team.
The British Medical Journal's accusations against Dr Wakefield -- that he fabricated his findings -- are therefore false. The mainstream media accusation that Dr Wakefield's findings have "never been replicated" is also blatantly false.
Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:
Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]
Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism
Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
Treated Asacol
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)
Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.
Hyperactive from 18 months.
Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen
core.
Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
Acute and chronic inflammation.
Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN’S DISEASE
Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development
MMR at 5 months [sic]
Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior
Hyperactive with food
Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
hyperplasia.
Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
Routine normal
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS**
[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of
age and MMR at 2.5. years]
Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death
(DPT)
MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.
“measles rash” week before
Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**
Treated
INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.
Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal
thereafter.
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum
with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction
2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years
Screaming attacks - / food related
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles
Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic inflammatory
cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma
INDTERMINATE COLITIS
Child 78. MMR 14 months
16 months “growling voice”
18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years
Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of
terminal ileum
Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
Histology
Ileum - reactive follicles
Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL’s
Slight increase in inflammatory cells
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
? CROHN’S DISEASE
NOTES:
(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.
(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper
BMJ caught in its own fraud
These documents reveal that the British Medical Journal has been caught in its own fraud for willfully ignoring this evidence, which was presented to it long before its recent publication of Brian Deer's article calling Dr Wakefield a fraud.
The BMJ willfully ignored this evidence and simply decided to destroy Dr Wakefield's professional reputation by any means necessary. As Dr Wakefield explains:
"In allowing itself to become the vehicle for Brian Deer’s particular brand of journalism; in circumventing the process of due diligence in its enthusiasm to “kill the beast”, the BMJ has taken a huge risk. As the document presented above shows, this was a mistake. Medicine, presented with the possibility of an iatrogenic catastrophe, has boarded a dissonant bandwagon and has gone after those who have concerns - genuine concerns - that childhood vaccines may be responsible, at least in part, for the autism epidemic. The relevant science has been grossly misrepresented, crushed beneath the wheels of a Public Relations 16-wheeler that is out of control. In the meantime a relentless tsunami of damaged children claims this land."
Brian Deer caught as a liar
It has also been revealed that journalist Brian Deer, the author of the BMJ article condemning Dr Wakefield as a fraud, is himself a liar. In attempting to gather evidence for his article in the BMJ, he lied about his identity and entered the home of one of the parents of the autism children. Specifically, he claimed he was working for The Sunday Times even though he was never a Sunday Times employee.
This is just the tip of the iceberg of the outright deception that has been used by the BMJ and Brian Deer in their attempt to silence a doctor whose only "crime" was publicly expressing concern about the safety of MMR vaccines.
That the BMJ and its writer Brian Deer have now been caught ignoring evidence and engaging in their own fraud gives credence to the idea that MMR vaccines may, indeed, not only be dangerous; but that they may be so dangerous that the top medical journals have to lie about the facts in order to protect them.
What's clear here is that the BMJ has strayed so far from the realm of evidence-based scientific thinking that it can no longer be called a reputable medical journal at all. Its callous disregard for the truth -- and its politically-motivated witch hunt against a researcher who only sought to protect the health of children -- exposes it as a danger to the scientific community and the world of conventional medicine.
As this truth unfolds, these revelations will rock the medical world and expose these science journals as the frauds they truly are. Think about this: While these medical journals are taking money from vaccine manufacturers (who pay their ads), they are ignoring any scientific evidence they don't like in order to vilify anyone who threatens the profits of these very same vaccine companies! And yet, these medical journals never admit that their very existence depends on the financial flow of money from these vaccine manufacturers who are strongly impacted by their editorial decisions!
There is fraud taking place in the vaccine industry today, of course, and the medical journals are the point men who push their distorted disinformation into the minds of doctors, journalists and anyone they can reach with their scientific distortions. At stake is the future of the vaccine industry, which is of course a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on misinformation and the ongoing scientific censorship of the facts surrounding the health risks posed by vaccines.
Read the book Callous Disregard
Dr Andrew Wakefield is the author of Callous Disregard, the book that exposes the truth behind conventional medicine's political witch hunt. The book is sold everywhere, including Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disregard-Autism-Vaccines-Tragedy/dp/1616081694/thekonformist
About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher, author and award-winning journalist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored more than 1,800 articles and dozens of reports, guides and interviews on natural health topics, reaching millions of readers with information that is saving lives and improving personal health around the world. Adams is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products. In 2010, Adams co-founded NaturalNews.TV, a natural health video sharing site that has now grown in popularity. He's also the founder of a well known HTML email software company whose 'Email Marketing Director' software currently runs the NaturalNews subscription database. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and practices nature photography, Capoeira, martial arts and organic gardening. Known by his callsign, the 'Health Ranger,' Adams posts his missions statements, health statistics and health photos at:
http://www.healthranger.org/
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html
(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Andrew Wakefield of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its reporter Brian Deer. This new evidence "completely negates the allegations that I committed scientific fraud. Brian Deer and Dr. Godlee of the British Medical Journal (BMJ) knew or should have known about the facts set out below before publishing their false allegations," says Dr Andrew Wakefield.
Newly-revealed documents show that on December 20th, 1996, a meeting of The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School featured a presentation by Professor Walker-Smith on seven of the children who would later become part of the group of patients Dr Wakefield wrote about in his 1998 The Lancet paper (which was later retracted by The Lancet).
Remember, Dr Wakefield has been accused of completely fabricating his findings about these same children in his 1998 paper, but these documents reveal that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two other researchers -- Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Amar Dhillon -- independently documented the same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.
Thus, Dr Wakefield could not have "fabricated" these findings as alleged by the British Medical Journal, which now finds itself in the position of needing to issue a retraction, or it must now expand its accusations of fraud to include Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Dhillon... essentially, the BMJ must now insist that a "conspiracy of fraud" existed among at least these three researchers, and possibly more, in order to back up its allegation that Dr Wakefield's study results were fabricated.
The smoking-gun evidence
Professor Walker-Smith's 1996 presentation at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School was entitled, "Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR - A Review of the First Seven Cases."
His presentation notes began with the following text: "“I wish today, to present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly present their case history [sic]."
He then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar Dhillon. Importantly, Dr Andrew Wakefield was not part of this investigation. This means that Dr Wakefield's findings were independently replicated by another medical research team.
The British Medical Journal's accusations against Dr Wakefield -- that he fabricated his findings -- are therefore false. The mainstream media accusation that Dr Wakefield's findings have "never been replicated" is also blatantly false.
Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:
Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]
Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism
Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
Treated Asacol
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)
Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.
Hyperactive from 18 months.
Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen
core.
Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
Acute and chronic inflammation.
Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN’S DISEASE
Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development
MMR at 5 months [sic]
Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior
Hyperactive with food
Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
hyperplasia.
Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
Routine normal
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS**
[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of
age and MMR at 2.5. years]
Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death
(DPT)
MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.
“measles rash” week before
Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**
Treated
INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.
Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal
thereafter.
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum
with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction
2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years
Screaming attacks - / food related
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles
Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic inflammatory
cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma
INDTERMINATE COLITIS
Child 78. MMR 14 months
16 months “growling voice”
18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years
Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of
terminal ileum
Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
Histology
Ileum - reactive follicles
Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL’s
Slight increase in inflammatory cells
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
? CROHN’S DISEASE
NOTES:
(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.
(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper
BMJ caught in its own fraud
These documents reveal that the British Medical Journal has been caught in its own fraud for willfully ignoring this evidence, which was presented to it long before its recent publication of Brian Deer's article calling Dr Wakefield a fraud.
The BMJ willfully ignored this evidence and simply decided to destroy Dr Wakefield's professional reputation by any means necessary. As Dr Wakefield explains:
"In allowing itself to become the vehicle for Brian Deer’s particular brand of journalism; in circumventing the process of due diligence in its enthusiasm to “kill the beast”, the BMJ has taken a huge risk. As the document presented above shows, this was a mistake. Medicine, presented with the possibility of an iatrogenic catastrophe, has boarded a dissonant bandwagon and has gone after those who have concerns - genuine concerns - that childhood vaccines may be responsible, at least in part, for the autism epidemic. The relevant science has been grossly misrepresented, crushed beneath the wheels of a Public Relations 16-wheeler that is out of control. In the meantime a relentless tsunami of damaged children claims this land."
Brian Deer caught as a liar
It has also been revealed that journalist Brian Deer, the author of the BMJ article condemning Dr Wakefield as a fraud, is himself a liar. In attempting to gather evidence for his article in the BMJ, he lied about his identity and entered the home of one of the parents of the autism children. Specifically, he claimed he was working for The Sunday Times even though he was never a Sunday Times employee.
This is just the tip of the iceberg of the outright deception that has been used by the BMJ and Brian Deer in their attempt to silence a doctor whose only "crime" was publicly expressing concern about the safety of MMR vaccines.
That the BMJ and its writer Brian Deer have now been caught ignoring evidence and engaging in their own fraud gives credence to the idea that MMR vaccines may, indeed, not only be dangerous; but that they may be so dangerous that the top medical journals have to lie about the facts in order to protect them.
What's clear here is that the BMJ has strayed so far from the realm of evidence-based scientific thinking that it can no longer be called a reputable medical journal at all. Its callous disregard for the truth -- and its politically-motivated witch hunt against a researcher who only sought to protect the health of children -- exposes it as a danger to the scientific community and the world of conventional medicine.
As this truth unfolds, these revelations will rock the medical world and expose these science journals as the frauds they truly are. Think about this: While these medical journals are taking money from vaccine manufacturers (who pay their ads), they are ignoring any scientific evidence they don't like in order to vilify anyone who threatens the profits of these very same vaccine companies! And yet, these medical journals never admit that their very existence depends on the financial flow of money from these vaccine manufacturers who are strongly impacted by their editorial decisions!
There is fraud taking place in the vaccine industry today, of course, and the medical journals are the point men who push their distorted disinformation into the minds of doctors, journalists and anyone they can reach with their scientific distortions. At stake is the future of the vaccine industry, which is of course a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on misinformation and the ongoing scientific censorship of the facts surrounding the health risks posed by vaccines.
Read the book Callous Disregard
Dr Andrew Wakefield is the author of Callous Disregard, the book that exposes the truth behind conventional medicine's political witch hunt. The book is sold everywhere, including Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disregard-Autism-Vaccines-Tragedy/dp/1616081694/thekonformist
About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher, author and award-winning journalist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored more than 1,800 articles and dozens of reports, guides and interviews on natural health topics, reaching millions of readers with information that is saving lives and improving personal health around the world. Adams is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products. In 2010, Adams co-founded NaturalNews.TV, a natural health video sharing site that has now grown in popularity. He's also the founder of a well known HTML email software company whose 'Email Marketing Director' software currently runs the NaturalNews subscription database. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and practices nature photography, Capoeira, martial arts and organic gardening. Known by his callsign, the 'Health Ranger,' Adams posts his missions statements, health statistics and health photos at:
http://www.healthranger.org/
America's Nazi Secret
http://www.sdwriteway.org/book_reviews/nazi.htm
America's Nazi Secret
Written by John Loftus
Reviewed by Dennis Moore
In a December 12, 2010 Associated Press story in the San Diego Union-Tribune Newspaper, titled "Report Details Ties Between U.S., Ex-Nazis," it indicates that CIA documents show intelligence officials provided more aid than previously known to ex-Nazis. Former U.S. government prosecutor, and former Army officer, John Loftus, has written a hardhitting book that exposes U.S. Department of Justice cover-up of Nazis and their American partners, "America's Nazi Secret," that parallels this report. The original version of this book, also by Loftus, "The Belarus Secret," was the "Knopf Nominee" for the Pulitzer Prize in History, and earned "60 Minutes" an Emmy Award for Outstanding Investigative Journalism. Thirty years later, this final manuscript has not been submitted for government review. All the censored items, and more, much more, are revealed for the first time. A third of modern history has been classified, until now.
Loftus makes some sensational allegations in his book, such as the rise of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and Enron's manic diversion of funds to Pakistan, both having their roots in the second generation Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood, protected by the US Justice Department. It seems as if there is enough complicity to spread around.
Dr. Vitold Tumash, who now lives in New York City, acknowledged to Mike Wallace on the CBS program 60 Minutes (May 16, 1982) that he had been mayor of Minsk for three months but denied having anything to do with the extermination of the Jews, according to Loftus' book. Captured Nazi documents in the National Archives tell a different story. They not only identify him as the mayor of Minsk but also reveal the municipal authorities supervised the ghetto and issued passports for the elimination of racial undesirables. (Report of 20 July, 1941, Military Administration Group, Army Group Center, National Archives Microfilm Section T175, Roll 2533, Frames 292820-821.) One of Tumash's fellow Byelorussians has written a book in which he states that Tumash solicited Franz Kushel (original manuscript) to organize a Byelorussian police force in Minsk (Konstantine Akula, Combat Trails). There is a copy of this book, published in Byelorussian, in the Library of Congress, according to Loftus.
It should be noted that "The Belarus Secret" is the first full account of an extraordinary clandestine operation carried out in direct defiance of presidential orders: How certain government agencies, in the aftermath of World War II, smuggled into the United States hundreds of Nazi collaborators from Eastern Europe - and have continued to protect them from investigation and deportation. This is the premise of Loftus' "America's Nazi Secret."
According to Loftus, the Nuremburg Trials were fixed, and the U.S. Justice Department did it. Also, according to Loftus, some of America's most influential families funded Hitler, and that ambitious lawyers in Washington covered it up under a cloak of national security. He alleges that the Justice Department brought Nazis into America by the thousands to be trained as cold war spies. Supporting documentation and National Archives that Loftus provides in his book makes some of these allegations undeniable.
"America's Nazi Secret" is an insider's history of how the United States Department of Justice obstructed Congress by: Blocking Congressional Investigations into famous American families who funded Hitler, Stalin and Arab terrorists; Lying to Congress, the GAO and the CIA about the Postwar Immigration of Eastern European Nazi war criminals to the US; and concealing from the 9/11 investigators the role of the Arab Nazi war criminals in recruiting modern Middle Eastern terrorist groups.
The aforementioned Union-Tribune story, certainly lends credence to Loftus' "America's Nazi Secret," as it indicates that declassified CIA files reveal that U.S. intelligence officials went to great lengths to protect a Ukrainian fascist leader and suspected Nazi collaborator from prosecution after World War II and used him to stir up trouble inside the Soviet Union from an office in New York, according to a new report to Congress. The report, titled "Hitler's Shadow: Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold War," draws from an unprecedented trove of records that the CIA was persuaded to declassify, and from more than 1 million digitized Army intelligence files that had long been inaccessible. The authors of this particular report, Norman J.W. Goda of the University of Florida and Richard Breitman of American University in Washington, among other things, indicate that U.S. intelligence officials used and protected ex-Nazis during the Cold War to a greater extent than previously known, and that no American intelligence agency aided Nazi henchman Adolf Eichmann's escape from Europe after the war.
In the Report by Goda and Breitman, referenced in the Union-Tribune story, it indicates that a Mykola Lebed led an underground movement to undermine the Kremlin and wage guerrilla operations for the CIA during the Cold War. This is the same Mykola Lebed that Loftus references in his "America's Nazi Secret,"under CIA codename "QR/Plumb/2 (P/2), as one of the most wanted war criminals in the Soviet Union. It doesn't take much to connect the dots between Goda and Breitman's Report, and Loftus' "America's Nazi Secret." Actually, Loftus was making these assertions in the 1980s, in his "The Belarus Secret."
In further regard to the aforementioned Mykola Lebed, Loftus points out in his book that it seems Congress did not know it, but the Attorney General of the United States had personally approved the immigration of Mykola Lebed, arguably the highest-ranking Nazi war criminal ever to enter the United States. Lebed was the head of the SB, the Ukrainain version of the Gestapo, and one of the top twenty war criminals wanted by the Soviet Union. Justice had given a false biography to the CIA. According to Loftus, CIA thought Lebed was an anti-Nazi resistance leader who could not immigrate legally to the US because he had been involved in plotting the death of a pre-war Polish politician.
Loftus relies on factual evidence and government documents to support his claims and contentions in regard to Mykola Lebed, among others. He states that National Archives Box 16 of the CIA's documents contains the files for Lebed, whom the CIA innocently believed to be a leader of the Anti Nazi resistance in the Ukraine, further stating that Justice Department Officials Richard Sullivan and Alan Ryan knew that Lebed was actually head of the Ukrainian version of the Gestapo, the SB, hired by CIA's rivals in the State Department OPC, and sponsored for immigration by the Attorney General of the United States. Loftus says that the Justice Department knowingly assisted the former Nazis of the SB with illegal entry into the United States. It begs the question, why? At times, "America's Nazi Secret" reads like a Robert Ludlum novel, but factual. Loftus further states in his book that Lebed's men had murdered tens of thousands of Polish, Jewish and Ukrainian citizens, and that he knew it to be true, because he found the original files of Mykola Lebed in the Army Intelligence vaults at Suitland, Maryland, and showed them to his superiors at the Justice Department: Ryan and Sullivan. He says that it will be impossible for them to deny that they were briefed in detail before allowing this killer to enter the United States.
Loftus points out in "America's Nazi Secret" that factionalism is the bane of emigre political organizations, and that increasingly remote from the reality of their homelands, the exiles exist in a hothouse atmosphere that breeds a mixture of intrigue and paranoia, with each faction becoming convinced that it alone is the legitimate instrument of struggle for national liberation, and the fights between them take on the bitterness of a family argument. He further indicates in his book that this is exactly what happened among the Byelorussians. Loftus states in his book that Princess Radziwill, a distant relative of Jaqueline Kennedy Onassis, was listed among the Byelorussian Nazi ranks, as were several Catholic priests and bishops.
Loftus further points out in his book that the central characters in the Byelorussian machinations, were Radoslaw Ostrowsky, President of the Byelorussian Central Council, and his intelligence chief, Mikolai Abramtchik. Poignant, and somewhat poetic, Loftus states that there came a point when Nazi Germany was dying in a Wagnerian funeral pyre ignited by Hitler, and Ostrowsky was determined to avoid the flames.
Loftus learned that Byelorussia, sometimes called White Russia, had become a post-war Soviet Republic with a population of some eight million. It borders on Poland in the West, Lithuania and Latvia in the northwest, Russia in the east, and the Ukraine in the south. During World War II, Byelorussia was occupied by the Germans from 1941 to 1944, and was one of the most devastated regions of the Soviet Union. Some of its citizens served the Nazi puppet government and some even served in an SS unit known as the Belarus Brigade which fought against the Americans, Loftus states in this riveting book. It was these ex-Nazis, now thought to be living in the United States, who were the object of the Office of Special Investigations inquiry, the unit that Loftus was attached to as a federal prosecutor in the 1980s. This Office of Special Investigations was the Nazi war crimes unit of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, giving Loftus an insider's history and vantage point as to how the United States Department of Justice obstructed Congress, by aiding and abetting ex-Nazis.
Loftus states in "America's Nazi Secrets" that his first assignment as a federal prosecutor attached to the Office of Special Investigations, was to help build cases against several Byelorussians who had been admitted to the United States and allowed to become citizens, despite strong evidence that they were guilty of war crimes. This book is riveting, reading like Ludlum's spy novel, "The Matarese Circle!"
He indicates that he never wanted to be a Nazi hunter when he grew up, being like most kids from the Irish Catholic neighborhoods of Boston, he knew little about the Holocaust and less about covert operations. They didn't teach those subjects at Boston Latin, Boston College or at Law school, where he matriculated. Quite frankly, Loftus indicated that at the time he could care less. He says that when President Jimmy Carter asked the Justice Department in 1979 to set up an Office of Special Investigations (OSI) to see if there were any Nazis hiding in America, he thought it was a joke. He, like most federal attorneys working in Washington around that time, thought that a Nazi war crimes investigation would be a bit dated. Rhetorically speaking, why re-open criminal cases against seventy-year-old men for crimes that had taken place outside the United States decades before? He ended up being the first person in forty years to review the classified archives of U.S. Intelligence. His job was to look in the old files for leads on any Nazis hiding in America. He got more than he bargained for when he went to Suitland, a little town just outside Washington, D.C., where the Government's secrets are buried, literally. There are twenty vaults underground; each vault is one acre in size, crammed floor to ceiling with classified files.
He indicated in his book that the State Department's classified files were worse, stating that they warned President Truman in writing that he must never allow the Jews to have their own country because it would be a "communist puppet state within three years." Of course, we all know differently now! Loftus further indicated that he had never realized that there was official anti-Semitism in the government of the United States.
Loftus states in his book that in 1985, three years after he had appeared on "60 Minutes" to expose Nazis working for US intelligence, the Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration finally decided it was safe to hold Congressional hearings, but without notice to the press or public. He further stated that the Justice Department had directly threatened him with disbarment if he disclosed what he knew about any living Nazi working for US or British intelligence.
Loftus, would speak of a Frank G. Wisner in his book as not quite looking like a "spymaster," balding and fleshy although he was not yet forty, he appeared to those who greeted him upon his arrival in West Germany in the summer of 1948 like the prosperous Wall Street lawyer he had been. He spoke with a trace of the soft accent of his native Mississippi, and his official title, Director of Policy Coordination, was innocuous, having chosen it himself for that very reason, according to Loftus. Wisner was a veteran practitioner of the black art of covert operations, and the newly organized OPC was in the front line of the secret war against the Soviet Union.
Wisner came to Germany at a time when Europe seemed on the brink of revolutionary upheaval. Berlin was under blockade by the Soviets and depended upon a tenuous airlift for its survival. The Communists were actively trying to overthrow the governments of Greece and Turkey, according to Loftus' book. Italy was on the verge of going communist. A Russian attempt to pinch off a piece of northern Iran was repulsed. Half of Europe had disappeared behind the Iron Curtain. To meet the challenge of Soviet expansion, President Harry S. Truman had made substantial amounts of military and economic assistance available to nations facing internal and external communist threats. "Our policy [is] to support the cause of freedom wherever it is threatened," he declared.
In 1948, many believed that a Soviet attack on Western Europe was imminent, as stated in "America's Nazi Secret." According to one retired government official, the entire American intelligence community was put on a war footing. Wisner's job was to plan an underground network of commando units to slow down the Communist advance, and then to guide allied forces in an invasion. To serve as the nucleus of his guerrilla forces, and to spearhead the invasion, Wisner would recruit those Nazi collaborators who had performed similar duties only a few years earlier for the Third Reich. Thus, the premise to "America's Nazi Secret!" Wisner was ordered to use his underground agents to overthrow the Communist-imposed governments, if possible, without overt American intervention. This is not too unlike what we did with the Contras and our once cozy relationship with the Shah of Iran, where it serves our immediate and best interests. To accomplish these goals, Loftus states that Wisner was hired by the State Department as head of the Office of Policy Coordination. This, perhaps, could be given as some twisted logic or justification for allowing known ex-Nazis, some known to have commited atrocities, to enter our country.
Loftus refers in his book to a "sickening scandal." He speaks of a Stanislaw Stankievich, "an educated man, a Doctor of Humanities." Yet, after assisting the Nazis with the invasion of White Russia, and being appointed to several government posts, his first task was to take his police force of local White Russian volunteers, without any help from the Germans, massacre all 8,000 Jews in a certain town on a single day. Stankievich had his policemen order the Jews to lie on top of each other in the graves, head to toe. That way, Stankievich could cram more bodies in and his troops could save ammunition by shooting through two layers of people at once, all according to Loftus' "America's Nazi Secret."
Loftus sums up his reasons for following up with his earlier written "The Belarus Secret," by stating in "America's Nazi Secret,": "Many years from now, our children will finally see these documents in the National Archives and ask us why we did nothing when the Nazis were still alive. I fear that we shall have to give them Dante's answer: that the seventh circle of hell is reserved for those who had the ability to prevent evil but did nothing. Our children deserve a better than that. But the time for justice is running out, and I am left alone."
To buy at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Americas-Nazi-Secret-Insiders-History/dp/1936296047/thekonformist
The 9/11 Social Network
Kris Millegan
roadsend@aol.com
http://www.madcowprod.com/01192011.htm
The 9/11 Social Network
January 19 201
Daniel Hopsicker
"The New American Drug Lords"
http://www.danielhopsicker.tv/
What does Mohamed Atta have in common with Carlos Salinas?
The tenth anniversary of 9/11 approaches. New books, new documentaries, saturated airwaves. Filled with sound, filled with fury, signifying—most of them—more or less nothing.
What have we learned?
A decade into the 21st Century. No rocket cars, no hovercraft, no trips to Mars. A world without Robocops. And the keen new insight is one we’d forgotten...
The social network. The innovation for which the decade will be remembered is Facebook.
What do drug traffickers, stolen car exporters, accountants, and terrorist hijackers have in common? Criminals have social networks too.
Interlocking social networks.
The basis for organized crime—relationships—is always the same, across time, space, and culture...
“He’s connected.”
Social notes from all over
I spend a week shepherding a film crew from French ARTE-TV doing a 2-hour documentary for the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attack around Venice Florida.
I thought they were looking for the story the mainstream media “overlooked.”
I was misinformed.
It is paint-by-numbers time. “Here we are where Mohamed Atta learned to fly. Here we are with one of his flight instructors. Is it true they weren’t well-liked?”
It is all a misunderstanding. A Gallic misconception.
Earlier I spent a month in Venice with a well-known writer from Ireland. He is doing a major book about 9/11. It is coming this fall.
After the 9/11 attack Secretary of State Colin Powell promises a government “white paper” that will be a “summary of evidence.” It is another empty promise. It is left to British Prime Minister Tony Blair to make the case against Osama Bin Laden.
Blair says, “Al Qaeda is a terrorist organization with ties to a global network."
A global network assisted the terrorist cadre. Shadowy, undefined. But global. Active everywhere from Venice, Florida to Dublin, Ireland…
The global network I think he had in mind.
South of the border
Carlos and Raul Salinas grow up on the Mexican border, opposite Laredo Texas. Their father is in charge of Mexican Customs along the border. In a country notorious for smuggling, the post soon makes him one of Mexico’s richest men.
On December 18, 1951, major Mexico City dailies reported that two children, Raul, 5, and Carlos, 3, and an 8-year old playmate found a .22 rifle in the closet, and played a ‘game’ with the 12-year old maid, an Indian named Manuela. She knelt down. They executed her.
The three year old, Carlos, is quoted saying, “I killed her with one shot. I am a hero.”
When Carlos grows up to be president his biography will be purged of this inconvenient fact.
Every newspaper account of the incident disappears from libraries across Mexico. His official biography states the 8-year old companion did the killing.
It is all just a misunderstanding.
They are making the truth disappear.
Friends in the Tower
A flight school with a blue-awning training terrorists to fly in the summer of 2000…
A DC9 busted in the Yucatan with 5.5 tons of cocaine in April of 2006…
If you believe the government, there is no connection.
The pre-existing criminal network in Venice is not a factor in the story of the 9/11 attack; the fact that Venice Florida is home base for Mohamed Atta’s terrorist cadre is nothing but mere happenstance.
Frederic Geffon in St. Petersburg Florida owns 5.5 tons of cocaine. At least, he owns Royal Sons Inc., and through some sleight-of-hand the bankruptcy trustee calls illegal, he’s also got a plane, a DC9 (N900SA).
Airport officials at St. Petersburg-Clearwater Intl Airport are instructed not to let the plane take off. But Geffon has friends in the tower, friends in high places. The plane takes off anyway, and leaves the country. So far so good!
Five days later his plane gets busted. 5.5 tons of cocaine just happens to be on his plane. Oops!
Geffen’s company is located at 224 E Airport Ave in Venice, the hangar where Huffman Aviation, right next door, parks its planes. Huffman Aviation’s owner, of course, is Wally Hilliard, a retired insurance executive from Green Bay Wisconsin.
Out out damed spot-of-bother
Three weeks after Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi begin training at Wally Hilliard’s flight school, Wally faces a “spot of bother.”
His Learjet is confiscated by DEA agents at Orlando Executive Airport. They find 43 lbs. of heroin onboard. Oops! After that, they won’t give Wally back his plane.
A federal judge won’t either. The judge rules that Wally is not an “innocent owner.”
But things have not gone completely dark for Wally Hilliard...
He doesn’t go to prison!
How many guys whose plane gets busted with 43 lbs. of heroin can say that?
For that matter, Frederic Geffon doesn’t go to prison either.
How many guys with a plane busted with 5.5 tons of cocaine can say that?
If Wally 'friends' Fred, will Fred 'friend' him back?
Are Wally Hilliard and Frederic Geffon in the same “social network?”
If Wally “friends” Fred on Facebook, will Fred “friend” him right back?
Maybe the government just finds it difficult to explain things like this to people who, you know, aren’t cleared for that kind of information.
People like you and me.
Maybe the government thinks its like what the Jack Nicholson character says in "A Few Good Men:" “You can’t handle the truth!”
Like that. That sort of thing. You think?
The documented and decades-long criminal activity in Venice is completely unrelated to the terrorist’s presence there, if you believe the government.
Just a coincidence that, probably, doesn't even rise to the level of a misunderstanding.
The Richest Man in Mexico & The Lord of the Skies
Hank Gonzalez is the richest man in Mexico.
He uses his post in the federal government to amass a fortune steering state money to his trucking firm. He is the essence of power in Mexico: wealth based on graft, on pillaging the national treasury.
The rumor for decades has been that he is the link between the drug business and the government.
The President of Mexico between 1988 and 1994 is Carlos Salinas. During that time forty-six reporters are murdered in Mexico.
A major drug figure, Juan Espattagozo, alias “El Azul” goes to work for Carlos Hank Gonzalez’s family’s trucking and shipping company, TMM, in 1992.
Mexico’s biggest drug baron at that time was Amado Carrillo. He will die during botched plastic surgery. But while he is alive, he is the Lord of the Skies His-Ownself.
Along with Carlos Hank Gonzalez, Amado is a major investor in Grupo TMM, according to U.S. intelligence.
A truck from Grupo TMM enters California with 4.5 tons of cocaine. Another is caught in Jalisco with 2 tons. According to the DEA, a TMM boat in 1998 offloads a ton of cocaine in the Florida Keys.
The two men also have a big stake in Mexico's biggest airline.
Operation White Tiger
Hank Gonzalez’s son is Carlos Hank Rhon. The thing to remember about him is: Hank loves wildlife.
After a sojourn in Asia he lands in Mexico City with twelve suitcases filled with jewels, ocelot pelts, and ivory tusks. He keeps a rare white Siberian tiger as a pet.
When a Tijuana gossip columnist makes fun of him in print, Jorge’s bodyguards cut him down with Uzis.
They go to prison. Not Hank.
A DEA investigation of the Hanks called Operation White Tiger accuses the family of having illicit business partnerships with some of the world's most infamous drug smugglers. The report accuses the Hank family of being narco-kingpins who launder money through Laredo National Bank.
The Washington Post, quoting parts of the report, says the Hank family "poses a significant criminal threat to the United States."
In 1993 a Cardinal is murdered in his car at the airport in Guadalajara. Afterwards the killers of Cardinal Jose Ocampo saunter over to board a Mexicana flight.
It is being held at the gate for their arrival. Onboard is Hank Rhon. The men fly back to Tijuana together. When the killers are caught, Hank is not charged.
Lucky Hank!
An aquatic interlude during which the crew abandons ship
It is Jan. 5, 1992, and a U.S. Coast Guard cutter is slicing through the Windward Passage, the sweep of warm blue Caribbean Sea separating Cuba from Haiti.
The Coast Guard cutter, the Campbell, is looking for the MV Harbour, a Chilean freighter steaming for Baltimore under a Panamanian flag carrying a cargo of zinc. Drug agents think a shipment of cocaine may be aboard.
It is close to midnight when the Harbour heaves into view. The Coast Guard cutter radios for permission to board. The Harbour douses its lights, and radios back, “We’re on fire and sinking.”
The crew is abandoning ship. They have been trying to scuttle the Harbour.
Coast Guard crewmen scramble aboard and put out the fire. Someone started it in the engine room. The Coast Guard finds three feet of water below decks. Another few minutes and the ship will go down. They stop the flooding in time, and begin to dig through the zinc.
They find 5 tons of cocaine. It is at the time the Coast Guard's third-largest cocaine seizure in history.
When the Harbour sailed to Chile from Peru, it was known as the Golden Hill, the Coast Guard learns. Then it was re-registered and renamed The Harbour by a Chilean company, headed by a Chilean shipping magnate named Manuel Losada.
A Black Eye, a Florida Company & a Creative Solution
Fast forward to 2006. The company that really owned the DC9 busted with 5.5 tons of cocaine is Skyway Communications. According to Skyway’s bankruptcy trustee, Fred Geffon, a Skyway principal, was, illegally, just “borrowing” the plane.
Skyway’s chief shareholder is Argyll Equities LLC, a private investment bank in tiny Boerne, Texas (pop. 7,500).
Argyll is in the business of providing “creative financial solutions globally.”
An example of Argyll’s creative financial solutions, according to documents filed with the SEC, is arranging for Mexican businessman Jose Serrano Segovia, who now "owns" the shipping line Grupo TMM, to get a $17 million “loan.”
According to The Santiago Times, an English language newspaper in Chile, Serrano turns around and provides a “creative financial solution” of his own, to “Chilean narcotics trafficker Manuel Losada, who is linked to both the Cali and Juarez Cartel.”
When Losada is arrested in the Chilean capital of Santiago, the paper reports, “He is linked to a shipment of five tons of cocaine, which U.S. drug enforcement officials in Miami intercepted on the vessel Harbour, as it headed toward Guantanamo Bay.”
“Mexican newspaper El Universal de Mexico connected Losada to the Juarez Cartel of Mexico, referring to him as the Chilean narcotics trafficker, in September 1997,” said the Santiago Times.
Both Losada and Jose Serrano deny any connection to the Juarez Cartel.
But Argyll Equities LLC owns nearly 21 million shares of SkyWay stock that is totally and utterly worthless.
Investment-wise, this could be considered something of a black eye... unless there are other considerations involved.
Why Henry Kissinger can't spell "turpitude"
Carlos Salinas is President of Mexico until 1994. As he approaches the end of his six-year term, Carlos Salinas’ future looks rosy. He is a top candidate to head the new World Trade Organization. He has been appointed to the Board of Directors of Dow Jones.
Henry Kissinger salutes him for having “quelled corruption and brought a gifted group of highly skilled technocrats into office.”
“Mr. Salinas has a claim to be hailed as one of the great men of the 20th Century,” gushes The Economist in London.
Then shortly before leaving office, Jose Ruiz Massieu, a long-time partner of the Salinas family, is murdered in Mexico City. The shooter trips and drops his gun while fleeing from the scene, and is caught.
The shooter says he was hired to kill Massieu by Raul Salinas, the President’s brother.
Raul is arrested for corruption, for murder, for all-around turpitude. The next day Citibank in New York files a criminal referral.
They accuse Raul of having $200,000 of suspicious funds in his bank account, but neglect to mention the hundreds of million just transferred to Switzerland from Salinas account.
Nobody get charged with anything, understand. Nobody does time.
It is just a trifle, a misunderstanding.
A charge of "Inexplicable Enrichment"
In a savvy move, Carlos appoints the murdered man’s brother to investigate the murder.
Mario Ruiz Massieu had joined the Salinas Administration’s War on Drugs just a month ago, but when he is stopped in the airport in Newark, New Jersey for failing to declare a suitcase full of money, more than $9 million is found in his U.S. bank account. It was deposited during Mario's month as one of Mexico’s drug fighters. Some month.
During his six years as President, press reports suggest Salinas may have salted away as much as $5 billion in ill-gotten gains.
Henry Kissinger is not waxing eloquent about Carlos' gifted group of technocrats much. Maybe he is concentrating his efforts in other directions.
Raul Salinas goes to prison. Carlos flees Mexico.
In the next few years disgraced former president Salinas is spotted in Boston, in Montreal, Costa Rica, the Caymans, and Cuba. He goes to Canada. Then he vanishes, and re-surfaces finally in an unlikely spot: Ireland.
Ireland has no extradition treaty with Mexico. But that’s not why he came.
He settles in Dublin, a city bathed in damp, cold mist. He came to Ireland for the weather.
He was misinformed.
Straight talk about a blacker reality
Swiss investigators become interested in Raul Salinas’ huge Swiss bank accounts in 1995.
They interview a former accountant for the Cali cartel living in hiding in the U.S., and learn that after American agents working with Mexican cops busted a five-ton shipment of Cali cartel cocaine in Acapulco, Raul Salinas intervened and got the cartel their cocaine back.
The Swiss bank investigators discover Raul Salinas was paid more than half a billion dollars to move cocaine through Mexico using railroad cars and trucks belonging to TMM.
The Swiss are puzzled by the U.S. government’s lack of interest in the matter.
An assistant to Mexico’s Attorney General secretly investigates Carlos Salinas. He escapes to the U.S. and writes a book about the Salinas family’s ties to narco-traffickers. “The U.S. public is very naïve about the drug business,” he says.
“They think Mexico has bad guys. Colombia has bad guys. They think the bad guys are all across the border. And U.S. law enforcement reinforces this ‘thinking.’ But the money from this illegal activity is in U.S. banks. So why aren’t U.S. banks the bad guys?"
"This is stupid.”
Canada’s ambassador to Mexico causes a stir with some equally blunt talk, telling a reporter that the U.S. War on Drugs is a bad joke.
“I think the pressure on Mexico from the U.S. is just a game that the American government plays for political reasons,” says Ambassador Marc Perron. “It hides a much blacker reality in that country (the U. S.)”
He didn't say the war on drugs is stupid. But he is forced to resign his position anyway, and step down.
"Man up" already on the $500 mil, dude.
Things die down. Several years later, Carlos Salinas returns to Mexico to flog his memoirs, which he has written to clear his name. While he is there a secret recording of a phone conversation from prison of his brother, Raul Salinas, to their sister surfaces.
In the recording Raul is telling his sister that Carlos needs to ‘man up’ about the hundreds of millions in Swiss bank accounts. The money belongs to Carlos, he tells his sister.
“Carlos shows enormous cowardice. The money is his. And then he says he doesn’t know anything about it.”
The tape is broadcast on every TV station in Mexico. Press reports say Carlos looks stunned.
He probably wants to say that it is all just a trifle, a misunderstanding.
But no one in Mexico is listening. Are they listening in Ireland, when Carlos returns?
When the big book on 9/11 by a famous author living in Ireland comes out on the 10th anniversary of the attack, what will it say?
While Mexican drug cartels make $30 billion transporting drugs to the U.S. drug market each year,a highly-placed source tells me, the American drug lords make $120 billion.
It is not a trifle. But it is a misunderstanding.
roadsend@aol.com
http://www.madcowprod.com/01192011.htm
The 9/11 Social Network
January 19 201
Daniel Hopsicker
"The New American Drug Lords"
http://www.danielhopsicker.tv/
What does Mohamed Atta have in common with Carlos Salinas?
The tenth anniversary of 9/11 approaches. New books, new documentaries, saturated airwaves. Filled with sound, filled with fury, signifying—most of them—more or less nothing.
What have we learned?
A decade into the 21st Century. No rocket cars, no hovercraft, no trips to Mars. A world without Robocops. And the keen new insight is one we’d forgotten...
The social network. The innovation for which the decade will be remembered is Facebook.
What do drug traffickers, stolen car exporters, accountants, and terrorist hijackers have in common? Criminals have social networks too.
Interlocking social networks.
The basis for organized crime—relationships—is always the same, across time, space, and culture...
“He’s connected.”
Social notes from all over
I spend a week shepherding a film crew from French ARTE-TV doing a 2-hour documentary for the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attack around Venice Florida.
I thought they were looking for the story the mainstream media “overlooked.”
I was misinformed.
It is paint-by-numbers time. “Here we are where Mohamed Atta learned to fly. Here we are with one of his flight instructors. Is it true they weren’t well-liked?”
It is all a misunderstanding. A Gallic misconception.
Earlier I spent a month in Venice with a well-known writer from Ireland. He is doing a major book about 9/11. It is coming this fall.
After the 9/11 attack Secretary of State Colin Powell promises a government “white paper” that will be a “summary of evidence.” It is another empty promise. It is left to British Prime Minister Tony Blair to make the case against Osama Bin Laden.
Blair says, “Al Qaeda is a terrorist organization with ties to a global network."
A global network assisted the terrorist cadre. Shadowy, undefined. But global. Active everywhere from Venice, Florida to Dublin, Ireland…
The global network I think he had in mind.
South of the border
Carlos and Raul Salinas grow up on the Mexican border, opposite Laredo Texas. Their father is in charge of Mexican Customs along the border. In a country notorious for smuggling, the post soon makes him one of Mexico’s richest men.
On December 18, 1951, major Mexico City dailies reported that two children, Raul, 5, and Carlos, 3, and an 8-year old playmate found a .22 rifle in the closet, and played a ‘game’ with the 12-year old maid, an Indian named Manuela. She knelt down. They executed her.
The three year old, Carlos, is quoted saying, “I killed her with one shot. I am a hero.”
When Carlos grows up to be president his biography will be purged of this inconvenient fact.
Every newspaper account of the incident disappears from libraries across Mexico. His official biography states the 8-year old companion did the killing.
It is all just a misunderstanding.
They are making the truth disappear.
Friends in the Tower
A flight school with a blue-awning training terrorists to fly in the summer of 2000…
A DC9 busted in the Yucatan with 5.5 tons of cocaine in April of 2006…
If you believe the government, there is no connection.
The pre-existing criminal network in Venice is not a factor in the story of the 9/11 attack; the fact that Venice Florida is home base for Mohamed Atta’s terrorist cadre is nothing but mere happenstance.
Frederic Geffon in St. Petersburg Florida owns 5.5 tons of cocaine. At least, he owns Royal Sons Inc., and through some sleight-of-hand the bankruptcy trustee calls illegal, he’s also got a plane, a DC9 (N900SA).
Airport officials at St. Petersburg-Clearwater Intl Airport are instructed not to let the plane take off. But Geffon has friends in the tower, friends in high places. The plane takes off anyway, and leaves the country. So far so good!
Five days later his plane gets busted. 5.5 tons of cocaine just happens to be on his plane. Oops!
Geffen’s company is located at 224 E Airport Ave in Venice, the hangar where Huffman Aviation, right next door, parks its planes. Huffman Aviation’s owner, of course, is Wally Hilliard, a retired insurance executive from Green Bay Wisconsin.
Out out damed spot-of-bother
Three weeks after Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi begin training at Wally Hilliard’s flight school, Wally faces a “spot of bother.”
His Learjet is confiscated by DEA agents at Orlando Executive Airport. They find 43 lbs. of heroin onboard. Oops! After that, they won’t give Wally back his plane.
A federal judge won’t either. The judge rules that Wally is not an “innocent owner.”
But things have not gone completely dark for Wally Hilliard...
He doesn’t go to prison!
How many guys whose plane gets busted with 43 lbs. of heroin can say that?
For that matter, Frederic Geffon doesn’t go to prison either.
How many guys with a plane busted with 5.5 tons of cocaine can say that?
If Wally 'friends' Fred, will Fred 'friend' him back?
Are Wally Hilliard and Frederic Geffon in the same “social network?”
If Wally “friends” Fred on Facebook, will Fred “friend” him right back?
Maybe the government just finds it difficult to explain things like this to people who, you know, aren’t cleared for that kind of information.
People like you and me.
Maybe the government thinks its like what the Jack Nicholson character says in "A Few Good Men:" “You can’t handle the truth!”
Like that. That sort of thing. You think?
The documented and decades-long criminal activity in Venice is completely unrelated to the terrorist’s presence there, if you believe the government.
Just a coincidence that, probably, doesn't even rise to the level of a misunderstanding.
The Richest Man in Mexico & The Lord of the Skies
Hank Gonzalez is the richest man in Mexico.
He uses his post in the federal government to amass a fortune steering state money to his trucking firm. He is the essence of power in Mexico: wealth based on graft, on pillaging the national treasury.
The rumor for decades has been that he is the link between the drug business and the government.
The President of Mexico between 1988 and 1994 is Carlos Salinas. During that time forty-six reporters are murdered in Mexico.
A major drug figure, Juan Espattagozo, alias “El Azul” goes to work for Carlos Hank Gonzalez’s family’s trucking and shipping company, TMM, in 1992.
Mexico’s biggest drug baron at that time was Amado Carrillo. He will die during botched plastic surgery. But while he is alive, he is the Lord of the Skies His-Ownself.
Along with Carlos Hank Gonzalez, Amado is a major investor in Grupo TMM, according to U.S. intelligence.
A truck from Grupo TMM enters California with 4.5 tons of cocaine. Another is caught in Jalisco with 2 tons. According to the DEA, a TMM boat in 1998 offloads a ton of cocaine in the Florida Keys.
The two men also have a big stake in Mexico's biggest airline.
Operation White Tiger
Hank Gonzalez’s son is Carlos Hank Rhon. The thing to remember about him is: Hank loves wildlife.
After a sojourn in Asia he lands in Mexico City with twelve suitcases filled with jewels, ocelot pelts, and ivory tusks. He keeps a rare white Siberian tiger as a pet.
When a Tijuana gossip columnist makes fun of him in print, Jorge’s bodyguards cut him down with Uzis.
They go to prison. Not Hank.
A DEA investigation of the Hanks called Operation White Tiger accuses the family of having illicit business partnerships with some of the world's most infamous drug smugglers. The report accuses the Hank family of being narco-kingpins who launder money through Laredo National Bank.
The Washington Post, quoting parts of the report, says the Hank family "poses a significant criminal threat to the United States."
In 1993 a Cardinal is murdered in his car at the airport in Guadalajara. Afterwards the killers of Cardinal Jose Ocampo saunter over to board a Mexicana flight.
It is being held at the gate for their arrival. Onboard is Hank Rhon. The men fly back to Tijuana together. When the killers are caught, Hank is not charged.
Lucky Hank!
An aquatic interlude during which the crew abandons ship
It is Jan. 5, 1992, and a U.S. Coast Guard cutter is slicing through the Windward Passage, the sweep of warm blue Caribbean Sea separating Cuba from Haiti.
The Coast Guard cutter, the Campbell, is looking for the MV Harbour, a Chilean freighter steaming for Baltimore under a Panamanian flag carrying a cargo of zinc. Drug agents think a shipment of cocaine may be aboard.
It is close to midnight when the Harbour heaves into view. The Coast Guard cutter radios for permission to board. The Harbour douses its lights, and radios back, “We’re on fire and sinking.”
The crew is abandoning ship. They have been trying to scuttle the Harbour.
Coast Guard crewmen scramble aboard and put out the fire. Someone started it in the engine room. The Coast Guard finds three feet of water below decks. Another few minutes and the ship will go down. They stop the flooding in time, and begin to dig through the zinc.
They find 5 tons of cocaine. It is at the time the Coast Guard's third-largest cocaine seizure in history.
When the Harbour sailed to Chile from Peru, it was known as the Golden Hill, the Coast Guard learns. Then it was re-registered and renamed The Harbour by a Chilean company, headed by a Chilean shipping magnate named Manuel Losada.
A Black Eye, a Florida Company & a Creative Solution
Fast forward to 2006. The company that really owned the DC9 busted with 5.5 tons of cocaine is Skyway Communications. According to Skyway’s bankruptcy trustee, Fred Geffon, a Skyway principal, was, illegally, just “borrowing” the plane.
Skyway’s chief shareholder is Argyll Equities LLC, a private investment bank in tiny Boerne, Texas (pop. 7,500).
Argyll is in the business of providing “creative financial solutions globally.”
An example of Argyll’s creative financial solutions, according to documents filed with the SEC, is arranging for Mexican businessman Jose Serrano Segovia, who now "owns" the shipping line Grupo TMM, to get a $17 million “loan.”
According to The Santiago Times, an English language newspaper in Chile, Serrano turns around and provides a “creative financial solution” of his own, to “Chilean narcotics trafficker Manuel Losada, who is linked to both the Cali and Juarez Cartel.”
When Losada is arrested in the Chilean capital of Santiago, the paper reports, “He is linked to a shipment of five tons of cocaine, which U.S. drug enforcement officials in Miami intercepted on the vessel Harbour, as it headed toward Guantanamo Bay.”
“Mexican newspaper El Universal de Mexico connected Losada to the Juarez Cartel of Mexico, referring to him as the Chilean narcotics trafficker, in September 1997,” said the Santiago Times.
Both Losada and Jose Serrano deny any connection to the Juarez Cartel.
But Argyll Equities LLC owns nearly 21 million shares of SkyWay stock that is totally and utterly worthless.
Investment-wise, this could be considered something of a black eye... unless there are other considerations involved.
Why Henry Kissinger can't spell "turpitude"
Carlos Salinas is President of Mexico until 1994. As he approaches the end of his six-year term, Carlos Salinas’ future looks rosy. He is a top candidate to head the new World Trade Organization. He has been appointed to the Board of Directors of Dow Jones.
Henry Kissinger salutes him for having “quelled corruption and brought a gifted group of highly skilled technocrats into office.”
“Mr. Salinas has a claim to be hailed as one of the great men of the 20th Century,” gushes The Economist in London.
Then shortly before leaving office, Jose Ruiz Massieu, a long-time partner of the Salinas family, is murdered in Mexico City. The shooter trips and drops his gun while fleeing from the scene, and is caught.
The shooter says he was hired to kill Massieu by Raul Salinas, the President’s brother.
Raul is arrested for corruption, for murder, for all-around turpitude. The next day Citibank in New York files a criminal referral.
They accuse Raul of having $200,000 of suspicious funds in his bank account, but neglect to mention the hundreds of million just transferred to Switzerland from Salinas account.
Nobody get charged with anything, understand. Nobody does time.
It is just a trifle, a misunderstanding.
A charge of "Inexplicable Enrichment"
In a savvy move, Carlos appoints the murdered man’s brother to investigate the murder.
Mario Ruiz Massieu had joined the Salinas Administration’s War on Drugs just a month ago, but when he is stopped in the airport in Newark, New Jersey for failing to declare a suitcase full of money, more than $9 million is found in his U.S. bank account. It was deposited during Mario's month as one of Mexico’s drug fighters. Some month.
During his six years as President, press reports suggest Salinas may have salted away as much as $5 billion in ill-gotten gains.
Henry Kissinger is not waxing eloquent about Carlos' gifted group of technocrats much. Maybe he is concentrating his efforts in other directions.
Raul Salinas goes to prison. Carlos flees Mexico.
In the next few years disgraced former president Salinas is spotted in Boston, in Montreal, Costa Rica, the Caymans, and Cuba. He goes to Canada. Then he vanishes, and re-surfaces finally in an unlikely spot: Ireland.
Ireland has no extradition treaty with Mexico. But that’s not why he came.
He settles in Dublin, a city bathed in damp, cold mist. He came to Ireland for the weather.
He was misinformed.
Straight talk about a blacker reality
Swiss investigators become interested in Raul Salinas’ huge Swiss bank accounts in 1995.
They interview a former accountant for the Cali cartel living in hiding in the U.S., and learn that after American agents working with Mexican cops busted a five-ton shipment of Cali cartel cocaine in Acapulco, Raul Salinas intervened and got the cartel their cocaine back.
The Swiss bank investigators discover Raul Salinas was paid more than half a billion dollars to move cocaine through Mexico using railroad cars and trucks belonging to TMM.
The Swiss are puzzled by the U.S. government’s lack of interest in the matter.
An assistant to Mexico’s Attorney General secretly investigates Carlos Salinas. He escapes to the U.S. and writes a book about the Salinas family’s ties to narco-traffickers. “The U.S. public is very naïve about the drug business,” he says.
“They think Mexico has bad guys. Colombia has bad guys. They think the bad guys are all across the border. And U.S. law enforcement reinforces this ‘thinking.’ But the money from this illegal activity is in U.S. banks. So why aren’t U.S. banks the bad guys?"
"This is stupid.”
Canada’s ambassador to Mexico causes a stir with some equally blunt talk, telling a reporter that the U.S. War on Drugs is a bad joke.
“I think the pressure on Mexico from the U.S. is just a game that the American government plays for political reasons,” says Ambassador Marc Perron. “It hides a much blacker reality in that country (the U. S.)”
He didn't say the war on drugs is stupid. But he is forced to resign his position anyway, and step down.
"Man up" already on the $500 mil, dude.
Things die down. Several years later, Carlos Salinas returns to Mexico to flog his memoirs, which he has written to clear his name. While he is there a secret recording of a phone conversation from prison of his brother, Raul Salinas, to their sister surfaces.
In the recording Raul is telling his sister that Carlos needs to ‘man up’ about the hundreds of millions in Swiss bank accounts. The money belongs to Carlos, he tells his sister.
“Carlos shows enormous cowardice. The money is his. And then he says he doesn’t know anything about it.”
The tape is broadcast on every TV station in Mexico. Press reports say Carlos looks stunned.
He probably wants to say that it is all just a trifle, a misunderstanding.
But no one in Mexico is listening. Are they listening in Ireland, when Carlos returns?
When the big book on 9/11 by a famous author living in Ireland comes out on the 10th anniversary of the attack, what will it say?
While Mexican drug cartels make $30 billion transporting drugs to the U.S. drug market each year,a highly-placed source tells me, the American drug lords make $120 billion.
It is not a trifle. But it is a misunderstanding.
Farewell to Countdown
Keith Olbermann, whether you love him or hate him, is a winner. At his worst, he is as pompous of a gasbag as they come, and he certainly was a key player in the smearing of Hillary during the 2008 election, leading to the victory of a Wall Street tool. Which is besides the point, because he's also easily the biggest draw that MSNBC has. To dump him would be as foolish as if Fox News dumped Bill O'Reilly or Glenn Beck.
But dump him they did. Rachel Maddow, showing what a good korporate team player liberal she is, declared on Bill Maher's Real Time that "he and the company made a mutual decision that 'Countdown' is done." To which Maher, with his usual sharp wit, replied: "That's always bullshit."
Bullshit indeed. As Olbermann said on his surprise final show, he thought about ranting against management after he was "told that this is going to be the last edition." So that settles it, contrary to Maddow's claim, this was a unilateral decision, not a mutual one.
Most theories as to why Olbermann was dumped focus on the takeover of NBC by Comcast, and it's hard to ignore that as the explanation. Olbermann was one of the few media voices to question if electronic voting fraud was behind the 2004 election results, report with outrage on the illegal torture done on war prisoners, report with outrage on the illegal spying on Americans done by both the Bush and Obama Administrations, report with outrage on the Hurricane Katrina failures, and perhaps his greatest sin of all, rail against the War in Iraq.
Simply put, Keith Olbermann, love him or hate him, has balls and sticks his neck out, and that's not what Comcast wants. They want someone they can control, preferring the face of MSNBC to be someone like Maddow, a cute, snuggly lesbian who rarely speaks out on economic injustice or other issues challenging the status quo. As her cowardly boilerplate response on Maher reveals, she already knows her place.
Why did Keith Olbermann leave MSNBC?
Michael Calderone
Sat Jan 22, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thecutline/20110122/ts_yblog_thecutline/why-is-keith-olbermann-out-of-msnbc
But dump him they did. Rachel Maddow, showing what a good korporate team player liberal she is, declared on Bill Maher's Real Time that "he and the company made a mutual decision that 'Countdown' is done." To which Maher, with his usual sharp wit, replied: "That's always bullshit."
Bullshit indeed. As Olbermann said on his surprise final show, he thought about ranting against management after he was "told that this is going to be the last edition." So that settles it, contrary to Maddow's claim, this was a unilateral decision, not a mutual one.
Most theories as to why Olbermann was dumped focus on the takeover of NBC by Comcast, and it's hard to ignore that as the explanation. Olbermann was one of the few media voices to question if electronic voting fraud was behind the 2004 election results, report with outrage on the illegal torture done on war prisoners, report with outrage on the illegal spying on Americans done by both the Bush and Obama Administrations, report with outrage on the Hurricane Katrina failures, and perhaps his greatest sin of all, rail against the War in Iraq.
Simply put, Keith Olbermann, love him or hate him, has balls and sticks his neck out, and that's not what Comcast wants. They want someone they can control, preferring the face of MSNBC to be someone like Maddow, a cute, snuggly lesbian who rarely speaks out on economic injustice or other issues challenging the status quo. As her cowardly boilerplate response on Maher reveals, she already knows her place.
Why did Keith Olbermann leave MSNBC?
Michael Calderone
Sat Jan 22, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thecutline/20110122/ts_yblog_thecutline/why-is-keith-olbermann-out-of-msnbc
Sorry, The Confederacy Was About Slavery
WaPo had a great article from James W. Loewen (the writer of the most excellent "Lies My Teacher Told Me" book on history) debunking five great myths of the Civil War:
1. The South seceded over states' rights.
2. Secession was about tariffs and taxes.
3. Most white Southerners didn't own slaves, so they wouldn't secede for slavery.
4. Abraham Lincoln went to war to end slavery.
5. The South couldn't have made it long as a slave society.
Here's Loewen on myth #1:
Confederate states did claim the right to secede, but no state claimed to be seceding for that right. In fact, Confederates opposed states' rights -- that is, the right of Northern states not to support slavery.
On Dec. 24, 1860, delegates at South Carolina's secession convention adopted a "Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union." It noted "an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery" and protested that Northern states had failed to "fulfill their constitutional obligations" by interfering with the return of fugitive slaves to bondage. Slavery, not states' rights, birthed the Civil War.
South Carolina was further upset that New York no longer allowed "slavery transit." In the past, if Charleston gentry wanted to spend August in the Hamptons, they could bring their cook along. No longer -- and South Carolina's delegates were outraged. In addition, they objected that New England states let black men vote and tolerated abolitionist societies. According to South Carolina, states should not have the right to let their citizens assemble and speak freely when what they said threatened slavery.
Other seceding states echoed South Carolina. "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery -- the greatest material interest of the world," proclaimed Mississippi in its own secession declaration, passed Jan. 9, 1861. "Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of the commerce of the earth... A blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization."
The South's opposition to states' rights is not surprising. Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. The people in power in Washington always oppose states' rights. Doing so preserves their own.
Five myths about why the South seceded
James W. Loewen
Sunday, January 9, 2011
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/07/AR2011010703178_pf.html
1. The South seceded over states' rights.
2. Secession was about tariffs and taxes.
3. Most white Southerners didn't own slaves, so they wouldn't secede for slavery.
4. Abraham Lincoln went to war to end slavery.
5. The South couldn't have made it long as a slave society.
Here's Loewen on myth #1:
Confederate states did claim the right to secede, but no state claimed to be seceding for that right. In fact, Confederates opposed states' rights -- that is, the right of Northern states not to support slavery.
On Dec. 24, 1860, delegates at South Carolina's secession convention adopted a "Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union." It noted "an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery" and protested that Northern states had failed to "fulfill their constitutional obligations" by interfering with the return of fugitive slaves to bondage. Slavery, not states' rights, birthed the Civil War.
South Carolina was further upset that New York no longer allowed "slavery transit." In the past, if Charleston gentry wanted to spend August in the Hamptons, they could bring their cook along. No longer -- and South Carolina's delegates were outraged. In addition, they objected that New England states let black men vote and tolerated abolitionist societies. According to South Carolina, states should not have the right to let their citizens assemble and speak freely when what they said threatened slavery.
Other seceding states echoed South Carolina. "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery -- the greatest material interest of the world," proclaimed Mississippi in its own secession declaration, passed Jan. 9, 1861. "Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of the commerce of the earth... A blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization."
The South's opposition to states' rights is not surprising. Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. The people in power in Washington always oppose states' rights. Doing so preserves their own.
Five myths about why the South seceded
James W. Loewen
Sunday, January 9, 2011
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/07/AR2011010703178_pf.html
Progressive Libertarians
Ralph Nader was once the most despised man in korporate America for his muckraking. He has since become despised by the yuppie liberal media mouthpieces who use him as a scapegoat for the 2000 election. (Antonin Scalia or Jeb Bush would be better choices.) Whatever his flaws, he is his own man and a trendsetter, and thus his recent embrace of the fusion politics of progressives and libertarians may hopefully be a sign of where things could be heading.
Think of it as the best of both Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. As trend researcher Gerald Celente described it, movement members would be "libertarian in the sense of government staying out of people's lives" and progressive "with the government having control of issues where they can make a difference." Nader declares this to be "the most exciting new political dynamic."
Nader: Progressive-libertarian alliance ‘the most exciting new political dynamic’ in US
Stephen C. Webster
Thursday, January 13th, 2011
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/progressive-libertarianism-the-exciting-political-dynamic-ralph-nader
Think of it as the best of both Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. As trend researcher Gerald Celente described it, movement members would be "libertarian in the sense of government staying out of people's lives" and progressive "with the government having control of issues where they can make a difference." Nader declares this to be "the most exciting new political dynamic."
Nader: Progressive-libertarian alliance ‘the most exciting new political dynamic’ in US
Stephen C. Webster
Thursday, January 13th, 2011
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/progressive-libertarianism-the-exciting-political-dynamic-ralph-nader
Kool Websites
Some websites worth strolling randomly while stoned off your gourd...
http://vaforeclosuredefense.blogspot.com/
VA Foreclosure Defense
Covering the news and stories that relate to the national foreclosure crisis.
Brown, Brown & Brown, P.C.
6269 Franconia Road
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
703.924.0223
For more than 65 years, Brown, Brown & Brown P.C. has provided aggressive representation to resolve disputes and advocate for justice, maintaining the highest legal standards and ethics.
Brown, Brown & Brown's commitment to each client is to provide the finest possible services so that you get the legal representation you deserve.
Our practice provides legal services ranging from discrimination, personal injury, DUI/DWI and other traffic offenses, to criminal defense and real estate law. Our attorneys conduct litigation at both the trial and appellate levels in federal and state courts in the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Our integrity and dedication to clients have established long-term trusting relationships throughout the D.C. Metropolitan Area. The quality of our service has secured Brown, Brown & Brown a reputation as one of the area's leading law firms.
*THE OUTCOME OF ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE WILL DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF FACTORS, AND THE OUTCOME OF ANY PARTICULAR CASE DOES NOT GUARANTEE SIMILAR RESULTS IN ANY FUTURE CASE*
*
http://roswellboutique.wordans.com/
ROSWELL BOUTIQUE | Custom t-shirts printing Online
Best choices for UFO t-shirts!
*
http://corduroyclub.com/
The Corduroy Appreciation Club is a social club which wishes to cultivate good fellowship by the advancement of Corduroy awareness, understanding, celebration and commemoration of the fabric and all related items. Club events are held on dates which resemble Corduroy.
*
http://www.crossroads-market.com/
Crossroads Market
For years Hometown Favorites has been your online source for regional and hard to find groceries, nostalgic candies and unique gift ideas like the world famous Decade Box. We keep striving to meet all your requests and needs and are proud to welcome you to...
Crossroads Market is your home for the most unique shopping experience on the Web! Shop at one store, two stores - all the stores and checkout on one simple and secure shopping cart!
If you shopped with Hometown Favorites in the past, you'll find all your regular items still here and your login still active. Candies at Hometown Favorites, grocery items at The Hard to Find Grocer and great gift ideas like Gift Baskets and Gift Boxes at The Grand Gift Emporium. Visit Giuliano's International Marketplace for a selection of foods from around globe.
Items you can't get at home. We offer the same great customer service and satisfaction that you love and a selection of items that will keep on growing. More stores are already on the way!
*
http://www.cngiinc.com/
The ancient Incas of Peru understood the importance of Pau D' Arco, and today its wonderful benefits are just beginning to surface, especially in the area of immune and lymphatic support. It has even been referred to as: The Miracle Bark from South America!
Pau D' Arco caught the attention of some American researchers and the scientific community about 30 years ago. Because of the drug companies' lack of interest in preventative health care, the research was very minimal. However the story is much different in South America. The inner bark of the Lapacho tree has been used medicinally by native South American people for centuries. [As a side note in South America Pau D' Arco is always consumed in a liquid form and never in capsules or tablets.]
Pau D' Arco extract boosts the immune & lymphatic system and has powerful antioxidant benefits. It is traditionally used to maintain youthful vigor and relieves minor pain and discomfort. It nourishes a healthy body and helps eliminate internal invaders, like parasites and pathogens.
The #1 reason for taking Pau D' Arco is because it's known to strengthen and protect the body's immune system. Your immune system is your first line of defense for ultimate health!
"Pau D' Arco is wonderful, I have been taking it since January of 2009. I take it every day, will not miss taking it."
-- Delores Carey
"I drink this in my water all day long and the health benefit just can't be rivaled. My two daughters like it as well and they hardly ever get sick, even after playing with other sick children. Pau D'Arco is amazing- I would recommend this to anyone.."
-- Ulla Arthur
"You gotta try Pau D' Arco!!!"
-- Tim Shariff
http://www.mypaudarco.com
Taking Pau D' Arco is simple. Just take two droppers (1ml each) a couple of times a day. You can take it straight or mix it with juice or water. Taken twice a day, the 4 ounce bottle is a full month’s supply.
What Are The Primary Benefits Of Pau D' Arco?
Fights Free Radicals
Anti-Viral Properties
Anti-Fungal Properties
Anti-Bacterial Properties
Helps Maintain Bowel Regularity
Analgesic Effects (Pain Killing Effects)
Anti-Biotic Effect Without The Side Effects
Supports Immune & Lymphatic System
Free USA Shipping
Intl Shipping $12 (1 bottle) - $28 (3 bottles)
Sincerely,
CNGI Inc.
1.760.444.0373 -- 1.888.900.(CNGI) 2644
http://vaforeclosuredefense.blogspot.com/
VA Foreclosure Defense
Covering the news and stories that relate to the national foreclosure crisis.
Brown, Brown & Brown, P.C.
6269 Franconia Road
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
703.924.0223
For more than 65 years, Brown, Brown & Brown P.C. has provided aggressive representation to resolve disputes and advocate for justice, maintaining the highest legal standards and ethics.
Brown, Brown & Brown's commitment to each client is to provide the finest possible services so that you get the legal representation you deserve.
Our practice provides legal services ranging from discrimination, personal injury, DUI/DWI and other traffic offenses, to criminal defense and real estate law. Our attorneys conduct litigation at both the trial and appellate levels in federal and state courts in the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Our integrity and dedication to clients have established long-term trusting relationships throughout the D.C. Metropolitan Area. The quality of our service has secured Brown, Brown & Brown a reputation as one of the area's leading law firms.
*THE OUTCOME OF ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE WILL DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF FACTORS, AND THE OUTCOME OF ANY PARTICULAR CASE DOES NOT GUARANTEE SIMILAR RESULTS IN ANY FUTURE CASE*
*
http://roswellboutique.wordans.com/
ROSWELL BOUTIQUE | Custom t-shirts printing Online
Best choices for UFO t-shirts!
*
http://corduroyclub.com/
The Corduroy Appreciation Club is a social club which wishes to cultivate good fellowship by the advancement of Corduroy awareness, understanding, celebration and commemoration of the fabric and all related items. Club events are held on dates which resemble Corduroy.
*
http://www.crossroads-market.com/
Crossroads Market
For years Hometown Favorites has been your online source for regional and hard to find groceries, nostalgic candies and unique gift ideas like the world famous Decade Box. We keep striving to meet all your requests and needs and are proud to welcome you to...
Crossroads Market is your home for the most unique shopping experience on the Web! Shop at one store, two stores - all the stores and checkout on one simple and secure shopping cart!
If you shopped with Hometown Favorites in the past, you'll find all your regular items still here and your login still active. Candies at Hometown Favorites, grocery items at The Hard to Find Grocer and great gift ideas like Gift Baskets and Gift Boxes at The Grand Gift Emporium. Visit Giuliano's International Marketplace for a selection of foods from around globe.
Items you can't get at home. We offer the same great customer service and satisfaction that you love and a selection of items that will keep on growing. More stores are already on the way!
*
http://www.cngiinc.com/
The ancient Incas of Peru understood the importance of Pau D' Arco, and today its wonderful benefits are just beginning to surface, especially in the area of immune and lymphatic support. It has even been referred to as: The Miracle Bark from South America!
Pau D' Arco caught the attention of some American researchers and the scientific community about 30 years ago. Because of the drug companies' lack of interest in preventative health care, the research was very minimal. However the story is much different in South America. The inner bark of the Lapacho tree has been used medicinally by native South American people for centuries. [As a side note in South America Pau D' Arco is always consumed in a liquid form and never in capsules or tablets.]
Pau D' Arco extract boosts the immune & lymphatic system and has powerful antioxidant benefits. It is traditionally used to maintain youthful vigor and relieves minor pain and discomfort. It nourishes a healthy body and helps eliminate internal invaders, like parasites and pathogens.
The #1 reason for taking Pau D' Arco is because it's known to strengthen and protect the body's immune system. Your immune system is your first line of defense for ultimate health!
"Pau D' Arco is wonderful, I have been taking it since January of 2009. I take it every day, will not miss taking it."
-- Delores Carey
"I drink this in my water all day long and the health benefit just can't be rivaled. My two daughters like it as well and they hardly ever get sick, even after playing with other sick children. Pau D'Arco is amazing- I would recommend this to anyone.."
-- Ulla Arthur
"You gotta try Pau D' Arco!!!"
-- Tim Shariff
http://www.mypaudarco.com
Taking Pau D' Arco is simple. Just take two droppers (1ml each) a couple of times a day. You can take it straight or mix it with juice or water. Taken twice a day, the 4 ounce bottle is a full month’s supply.
What Are The Primary Benefits Of Pau D' Arco?
Fights Free Radicals
Anti-Viral Properties
Anti-Fungal Properties
Anti-Bacterial Properties
Helps Maintain Bowel Regularity
Analgesic Effects (Pain Killing Effects)
Anti-Biotic Effect Without The Side Effects
Supports Immune & Lymphatic System
Free USA Shipping
Intl Shipping $12 (1 bottle) - $28 (3 bottles)
Sincerely,
CNGI Inc.
1.760.444.0373 -- 1.888.900.(CNGI) 2644
Chicks Dig Goebbels
Say what you will about Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels, but the dude knew how to score with women. Unlike Hitler (who was a decided bust with the babes) Goebbels was a total chick magnet. Like Casanova, he had numerous sexual conquests which he thoroughly documented in his personal diaries. Not bad for a feeble, club-footed guy with the nickname of "Poison Dwarf" to his credit.
Joseph Goebbels: the 'Casanova of the Nazis'
Allan Hall
08 Jan 2011
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8247909/Joseph-Goebbels-the-Casanova-of-the-Nazis.html
Joseph Goebbels: the 'Casanova of the Nazis'
Allan Hall
08 Jan 2011
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8247909/Joseph-Goebbels-the-Casanova-of-the-Nazis.html
JP Morgan: Food Stamps Welfare Queen
From The Economic Collapse Blog:
"JP Morgan is the largest processor of food stamp benefits in the United States. JP Morgan has contracted to provide food stamp debit cards in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. JP Morgan is paid for each case that it handles, so that means that the more Americans that go on food stamps, the more profits JP Morgan makes. Yes, you read that correctly. When the number of Americans on food stamps goes up, JP Morgan makes more money... Considering the fact that the number of Americans on food stamps has exploded from 26 million in 2007 to 43 million today, one can only imagine how much JP Morgan's profits in this area have soared. But doesn't this give JP Morgan an incentive to keep the number of Americans enrolled in the food stamp program as high as possible?"
The author then asks:
"So is this what America is turning into?
A place where tens of millions of the unemployed and the working poor crawl over to Wal-Mart and the dollar store every month to use the food stamp debit cards provided to them by JP Morgan?"
But wait, there's more:
"Apparently states have found that they can save millions of dollars by 'outsourcing' the provision of these benefits to big financial firms like JP Morgan.
So what happens if you have a problem with your food stamp debit card?
Well, you call up a JP Morgan service center. When you do this, there is a very good chance that you are going to be helped by a JP Morgan call center employee in India.
That's right - it turns out that JP Morgan is saving money by 'outsourcing' food stamp customer service calls to India.
When ABC News asked JP Morgan about this, the company would not tell ABC News which states have customer service calls sent to India and which states have them handled inside the United States....
JP Morgan is the only one today still operating public-assistance call centers overseas. The company refused to say which states had calls routed to India and which ones had calls stay domestically. That decision, the company said, was often left up to the individual states."
The More Americans That Go On Food Stamps The More Money JP Morgan Makes
January 19th, 2011
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-more-americans-that-go-on-food-stamps-the-more-money-jp-morgan-makes
"JP Morgan is the largest processor of food stamp benefits in the United States. JP Morgan has contracted to provide food stamp debit cards in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. JP Morgan is paid for each case that it handles, so that means that the more Americans that go on food stamps, the more profits JP Morgan makes. Yes, you read that correctly. When the number of Americans on food stamps goes up, JP Morgan makes more money... Considering the fact that the number of Americans on food stamps has exploded from 26 million in 2007 to 43 million today, one can only imagine how much JP Morgan's profits in this area have soared. But doesn't this give JP Morgan an incentive to keep the number of Americans enrolled in the food stamp program as high as possible?"
The author then asks:
"So is this what America is turning into?
A place where tens of millions of the unemployed and the working poor crawl over to Wal-Mart and the dollar store every month to use the food stamp debit cards provided to them by JP Morgan?"
But wait, there's more:
"Apparently states have found that they can save millions of dollars by 'outsourcing' the provision of these benefits to big financial firms like JP Morgan.
So what happens if you have a problem with your food stamp debit card?
Well, you call up a JP Morgan service center. When you do this, there is a very good chance that you are going to be helped by a JP Morgan call center employee in India.
That's right - it turns out that JP Morgan is saving money by 'outsourcing' food stamp customer service calls to India.
When ABC News asked JP Morgan about this, the company would not tell ABC News which states have customer service calls sent to India and which states have them handled inside the United States....
JP Morgan is the only one today still operating public-assistance call centers overseas. The company refused to say which states had calls routed to India and which ones had calls stay domestically. That decision, the company said, was often left up to the individual states."
The More Americans That Go On Food Stamps The More Money JP Morgan Makes
January 19th, 2011
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-more-americans-that-go-on-food-stamps-the-more-money-jp-morgan-makes
The President Adams Payroll Tax
Nothing Like an Individual Mandate
Jon Walker
Friday January 21, 2011
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2011/01/21/the-president-adams-payroll-tax-nothing-like-an-individual-mandate
The incredible degree to which many “liberal” writers have gone all-out to defend the previously conservative idea of an individual mandate requiring people to give a private corporation their money is bizarre. That latest attempt seems to be a dishonest interpretation of a 1798 law that created a payroll tax to pay for federal socialized medicine. From Rick Ungar:
In July of 1798, Congress passed – and President John Adams signed -“An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen.” The law authorized the creation of a government operated marine hospital service and mandated that privately employed sailors be required to purchase health care insurance...
[I]t created the Marine Hospital Service, a series of hospitals built and operated by the federal government to treat injured and ailing privately employed sailors. This government provided healthcare service was to be paid for by a mandatory tax on the maritime sailors (a little more than 1% of a sailor’s wages), the same to be withheld from a sailor’s pay and turned over to the government by the ship’s owner. The payment of this tax for health care was not optional. If a sailor wanted to work, he had to pay up.
This is nothing like the individual mandate in the new health care law. What it is similar to is Medicare, which is also a direct government health care service paid for by a payroll tax.
While it is true that this tax was technically “mandatory,” every tax, almost by definition, is mandatory. The idea that the government has the right to force you to pay them a tax is a fairly uncontroversial foundational principle of modern government.
The fact the founders supported the completely uncontroversial idea that the government could levy taxes on individuals and use those funds to provide government services–such as health care–in absolutely no way indicates, one way or another, their support for using government power to require people to buy an expensive product from a private corporation. Just because this law deals with health care is immaterial. This tax no more indicates support for the individual mandate than anyone of the other hundreds of laws that “mandated” individuals pay a tax to the government.
It does show the founders supported socialized medicine
I’m glad that this law has come to light, though, because it shows the founding fathers had no principle objections to socialized medicine, government-run health insurance, or an entitlement programs funded by a payroll tax. It is strong proof that they would, in general, have no Constitutional issue with Medicare or single-payer health care. It is good to know when it come to health care issues, our founders were more prepared to adopt far more sensible, direct solutions than the highly inefficient “fixes” supported by President Obama and the modern Democratic Party.
Progressives should be pointing to this law to show that the founders had no problem with the basic design of the honestly progressive solution of single payer. However, using it to defend the idea of the individual mandate seems to a be a real distortion.
Progressives really need to stop defending the individual mandate. It isn’t progressive, it isn’t popular, it isn’t necessary, and, most importantly, it is an inherently inferior way of expending coverage when compared to a truly progressive approach.
Jon Walker
Friday January 21, 2011
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2011/01/21/the-president-adams-payroll-tax-nothing-like-an-individual-mandate
The incredible degree to which many “liberal” writers have gone all-out to defend the previously conservative idea of an individual mandate requiring people to give a private corporation their money is bizarre. That latest attempt seems to be a dishonest interpretation of a 1798 law that created a payroll tax to pay for federal socialized medicine. From Rick Ungar:
In July of 1798, Congress passed – and President John Adams signed -“An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen.” The law authorized the creation of a government operated marine hospital service and mandated that privately employed sailors be required to purchase health care insurance...
[I]t created the Marine Hospital Service, a series of hospitals built and operated by the federal government to treat injured and ailing privately employed sailors. This government provided healthcare service was to be paid for by a mandatory tax on the maritime sailors (a little more than 1% of a sailor’s wages), the same to be withheld from a sailor’s pay and turned over to the government by the ship’s owner. The payment of this tax for health care was not optional. If a sailor wanted to work, he had to pay up.
This is nothing like the individual mandate in the new health care law. What it is similar to is Medicare, which is also a direct government health care service paid for by a payroll tax.
While it is true that this tax was technically “mandatory,” every tax, almost by definition, is mandatory. The idea that the government has the right to force you to pay them a tax is a fairly uncontroversial foundational principle of modern government.
The fact the founders supported the completely uncontroversial idea that the government could levy taxes on individuals and use those funds to provide government services–such as health care–in absolutely no way indicates, one way or another, their support for using government power to require people to buy an expensive product from a private corporation. Just because this law deals with health care is immaterial. This tax no more indicates support for the individual mandate than anyone of the other hundreds of laws that “mandated” individuals pay a tax to the government.
It does show the founders supported socialized medicine
I’m glad that this law has come to light, though, because it shows the founding fathers had no principle objections to socialized medicine, government-run health insurance, or an entitlement programs funded by a payroll tax. It is strong proof that they would, in general, have no Constitutional issue with Medicare or single-payer health care. It is good to know when it come to health care issues, our founders were more prepared to adopt far more sensible, direct solutions than the highly inefficient “fixes” supported by President Obama and the modern Democratic Party.
Progressives should be pointing to this law to show that the founders had no problem with the basic design of the honestly progressive solution of single payer. However, using it to defend the idea of the individual mandate seems to a be a real distortion.
Progressives really need to stop defending the individual mandate. It isn’t progressive, it isn’t popular, it isn’t necessary, and, most importantly, it is an inherently inferior way of expending coverage when compared to a truly progressive approach.
What's Happening in Egypt Explained
Nick Baumann
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/01/whats-happening-egypt-explained
The basics: Egypt is a large, mostly Arab, mostly Muslim country. At around 80 million people, it has the largest population in the Middle East and the third-largest in Africa. Most of Egypt is in North Africa, although the part of the country that borders Israel, the Sinai peninsula, is in Asia. Its other neighbors are Sudan (to the South), Libya (to the West), and Saudi Arabia (across the Gulf of Aqaba to the East). It has been ruled by Hosni Mubarak since 1981.
What's happening? Inspired by the recent protests that led to the fall of the Tunisian government and the ousting of longtime Tunisian dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Egyptians have joined other protesters across the Arab world (in Algeria, notably) in protesting their autocratic governments, high levels of corruption, and grinding poverty. In Egypt, tens of thousands of protesters have taken to the streets. Here's a photo of one of the protests in Cairo, the capital (via Twitter):
Why are Egyptians unhappy? They have basically no more freedom than Tunisians. Egypt is ranked 138th of 167 countries on The Economist's Democracy index, a widely accepted measure of political freedom. That ranking puts Egypt just seven spots ahead of Tunisia. And Egyptians are significantly poorer than their cousins to the west.
How did this all start? This particular round of protests started with the protests in Tunisia. But like their Tunisian counterparts, Egyptian protesters have pointed to a specific incident as inspiration for the unrest. Many have cited the June 2010 beating death of Khaled Said (warning: graphic photos), allegedly at the hands of police, as motivation for their rage. But it's also clear that the issues here are larger.
Why is this more complicated for the US than Tunisia was? The Tunisian regime was a key ally for the US in the fight against Al Qaeda. But the US government's ties to Tunisia's Ben Ali pale in comparison to American ties to Egypt. Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Institution, a centrist think tank, explains:
Predictions that a Tunisia-like uprising will soon topple Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak are premature—the Egyptian regime, with its well-paid military, is likely to be more unified and more ruthless than its Tunisian counterparts were... The U.S. is the primary benefactor of the Egyptian regime, which, in turn, has reliably supported American regional priorities. After Iraq, Afghanistan, and Israel, Egypt is the largest recipient of U.S. assistance, including $1.3 billion in annual military aid. In other words, if the army ever decides to shoot into a crowd of unarmed protestors, it will be shooting with hardware provided by the United States. As Steven Cook of the Council on Foreign Relations points out, the Egyptian military is "not there to project power, but to protect the regime."
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/01/whats-happening-egypt-explained
The basics: Egypt is a large, mostly Arab, mostly Muslim country. At around 80 million people, it has the largest population in the Middle East and the third-largest in Africa. Most of Egypt is in North Africa, although the part of the country that borders Israel, the Sinai peninsula, is in Asia. Its other neighbors are Sudan (to the South), Libya (to the West), and Saudi Arabia (across the Gulf of Aqaba to the East). It has been ruled by Hosni Mubarak since 1981.
What's happening? Inspired by the recent protests that led to the fall of the Tunisian government and the ousting of longtime Tunisian dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Egyptians have joined other protesters across the Arab world (in Algeria, notably) in protesting their autocratic governments, high levels of corruption, and grinding poverty. In Egypt, tens of thousands of protesters have taken to the streets. Here's a photo of one of the protests in Cairo, the capital (via Twitter):
Why are Egyptians unhappy? They have basically no more freedom than Tunisians. Egypt is ranked 138th of 167 countries on The Economist's Democracy index, a widely accepted measure of political freedom. That ranking puts Egypt just seven spots ahead of Tunisia. And Egyptians are significantly poorer than their cousins to the west.
How did this all start? This particular round of protests started with the protests in Tunisia. But like their Tunisian counterparts, Egyptian protesters have pointed to a specific incident as inspiration for the unrest. Many have cited the June 2010 beating death of Khaled Said (warning: graphic photos), allegedly at the hands of police, as motivation for their rage. But it's also clear that the issues here are larger.
Why is this more complicated for the US than Tunisia was? The Tunisian regime was a key ally for the US in the fight against Al Qaeda. But the US government's ties to Tunisia's Ben Ali pale in comparison to American ties to Egypt. Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Institution, a centrist think tank, explains:
Predictions that a Tunisia-like uprising will soon topple Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak are premature—the Egyptian regime, with its well-paid military, is likely to be more unified and more ruthless than its Tunisian counterparts were... The U.S. is the primary benefactor of the Egyptian regime, which, in turn, has reliably supported American regional priorities. After Iraq, Afghanistan, and Israel, Egypt is the largest recipient of U.S. assistance, including $1.3 billion in annual military aid. In other words, if the army ever decides to shoot into a crowd of unarmed protestors, it will be shooting with hardware provided by the United States. As Steven Cook of the Council on Foreign Relations points out, the Egyptian military is "not there to project power, but to protect the regime."
Meet the New Boss, Egypt
PrisonPlanet.com also has a good piece on the crisis in Egypt:
The revolt in Egypt is an organically driven people-power movement to oust a dictator, restore universal freedoms, and wrestle the country free from the clutches of the US military-industrial complex, but the man now being positioned to form a new government is a pied piper working for the very same globalists and NGO’s that autocrat leader Hosni Mubarak has dutifully served for nearly 30 years...
ElBaradei serves on the Board of Trustees of the International Crisis Group, who today issued a press release protesting the decision on behalf of Egyptian authorities to place ElBaradei under house arrest.
International Crisis Group is a shadowy NGO (non-governmental organization) that enjoys an annual budget of over $15 million and is bankrolled by the likes of Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. Soros himself serves as a member of the organization’s Executive Committee. In other words, this is a major geopolitical steering group for the global elite.
The fact that their man ElBaradei is being primed to head up the post-Mubarak government should set alarm bells ringing in the ears of every demonstrator who is protesting in the name of trying to wrestle Egypt away from the clutches of new world order control.
Mohamed ElBaradei: Globalist Pied Piper Of The Egyptian Revolt
Paul Joseph Watson
Saturday, January 29, 2011
http://www.prisonplanet.com/mohamed-elbaradei-globalist-pied-piper-of-the-egyptian-revolt.html
The revolt in Egypt is an organically driven people-power movement to oust a dictator, restore universal freedoms, and wrestle the country free from the clutches of the US military-industrial complex, but the man now being positioned to form a new government is a pied piper working for the very same globalists and NGO’s that autocrat leader Hosni Mubarak has dutifully served for nearly 30 years...
ElBaradei serves on the Board of Trustees of the International Crisis Group, who today issued a press release protesting the decision on behalf of Egyptian authorities to place ElBaradei under house arrest.
International Crisis Group is a shadowy NGO (non-governmental organization) that enjoys an annual budget of over $15 million and is bankrolled by the likes of Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. Soros himself serves as a member of the organization’s Executive Committee. In other words, this is a major geopolitical steering group for the global elite.
The fact that their man ElBaradei is being primed to head up the post-Mubarak government should set alarm bells ringing in the ears of every demonstrator who is protesting in the name of trying to wrestle Egypt away from the clutches of new world order control.
Mohamed ElBaradei: Globalist Pied Piper Of The Egyptian Revolt
Paul Joseph Watson
Saturday, January 29, 2011
http://www.prisonplanet.com/mohamed-elbaradei-globalist-pied-piper-of-the-egyptian-revolt.html
Jesse Ventura Vs. The TSA and DHS
After a brief media frenzy in November, news reports on the TSA abuse of airline passengers have nearly disappeared. Fortunately, that may be changing thanks to a lawsuit filed by Jesse Ventura. As reported by PrisonPlanet.com:
Former Governor Jesse Ventura has taken steps to sue the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security, naming their chiefs John Pistole and ‘Big Sis’ Janet Napolitano in a lawsuit that will take on invasive airport pat-downs. Ventura first told Alex Jones of his intent to sue the TSA privately back in November while traveling for the making of TruTV’s “Conspiracy Theory,” expressing grave concern about what he viewed as his country’s transformation into East Germany...
Ventura filed his lawsuit Monday, January 24, 2011 in Minnesota and news reports have named David Olsen as his lawyer. The former governor has indicated that his suit will include violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 4th Amendment, arguing that he and others with disabilities have been discriminated against and unduly singled out by TSA despite presenting no threat and warranting no reason for lawful search. Further, Ventura has argued that his ability to travel freely has been infringed, hampering his ability to work.
The good news is Ventura has a great chance of winning, in no small part due to the TSA policies being bad for business. As PrisonPlanet.com notes: "Tourism is down by billions of dollars; angry travel and vacation industry representatives tried to get TSA to back down, citing some 41 million potential fliers who ‘avoided’ travel due to anxiety over airport security."
Ventura Strikes Back with Lawsuit Against TSA
Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
January 25, 2011
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ventura-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-against-tsa.html
Former Governor Jesse Ventura has taken steps to sue the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security, naming their chiefs John Pistole and ‘Big Sis’ Janet Napolitano in a lawsuit that will take on invasive airport pat-downs. Ventura first told Alex Jones of his intent to sue the TSA privately back in November while traveling for the making of TruTV’s “Conspiracy Theory,” expressing grave concern about what he viewed as his country’s transformation into East Germany...
Ventura filed his lawsuit Monday, January 24, 2011 in Minnesota and news reports have named David Olsen as his lawyer. The former governor has indicated that his suit will include violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 4th Amendment, arguing that he and others with disabilities have been discriminated against and unduly singled out by TSA despite presenting no threat and warranting no reason for lawful search. Further, Ventura has argued that his ability to travel freely has been infringed, hampering his ability to work.
The good news is Ventura has a great chance of winning, in no small part due to the TSA policies being bad for business. As PrisonPlanet.com notes: "Tourism is down by billions of dollars; angry travel and vacation industry representatives tried to get TSA to back down, citing some 41 million potential fliers who ‘avoided’ travel due to anxiety over airport security."
Ventura Strikes Back with Lawsuit Against TSA
Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
January 25, 2011
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ventura-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-against-tsa.html
Beast of the Year 2010: Glenn Beck
The votes are in, and The Konformist readers have spoken. Glenn Beck is your choice for the 2009 Beast of the Year - a choice that is well deserved.
One of the two big stories in the year following Obama's first 100 days was the rise of an extremely far right - and an often extremely crazy - movement given the label of "Tea Party" by some, or (more appropriately) "Teabaggers" by others. Point Zero of the Teabagger movement was Glenn Beck and his multimedia empire. Of course, there is nothing new here: during the Clinton years, Rush Limbaugh became a powerful media voice in his own right, and during the era of George W. Bush, Beck's current employer Fox News fueled the rise of Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity, while Ann Coulter became a shrill media commentator in her own right (among others.) So mark Beck down as the latest example of the right wing media darling, the only question being if this self-described rodeo clown will become a harmless buffoon who becomes a self-parody, or if he becomes a figurehead for a frightening reactionary movement. Stay tuned...
Runner-Up: Ben Bernanke
In the unlikely event that Beck can no longer fill its duties as Beast of the Year, Ben Bernanke is ready to take over the crown. Rest assured the BOTY trophy is in good hands either way. As the other big story of the past year has been the continued enrichment of the giant banking monoliths by the US government after the election of Obama, Bernanke, as head of the Federal Reserve, is ground zero of this vast larceny.
In any case, we salute you, Glenn and Ben. Congratulations, and keep up the great work!!!
One of the two big stories in the year following Obama's first 100 days was the rise of an extremely far right - and an often extremely crazy - movement given the label of "Tea Party" by some, or (more appropriately) "Teabaggers" by others. Point Zero of the Teabagger movement was Glenn Beck and his multimedia empire. Of course, there is nothing new here: during the Clinton years, Rush Limbaugh became a powerful media voice in his own right, and during the era of George W. Bush, Beck's current employer Fox News fueled the rise of Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity, while Ann Coulter became a shrill media commentator in her own right (among others.) So mark Beck down as the latest example of the right wing media darling, the only question being if this self-described rodeo clown will become a harmless buffoon who becomes a self-parody, or if he becomes a figurehead for a frightening reactionary movement. Stay tuned...
Runner-Up: Ben Bernanke
In the unlikely event that Beck can no longer fill its duties as Beast of the Year, Ben Bernanke is ready to take over the crown. Rest assured the BOTY trophy is in good hands either way. As the other big story of the past year has been the continued enrichment of the giant banking monoliths by the US government after the election of Obama, Bernanke, as head of the Federal Reserve, is ground zero of this vast larceny.
In any case, we salute you, Glenn and Ben. Congratulations, and keep up the great work!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




