Thursday, February 25, 2010

Tea Partyers Are White Nationalists, Pure and Simple

http://blackagendareport.com/?q=content/tea-partyers-are-white-nationalists-pure-and-simple
Tea Partyers Are White Nationalists, Pure and Simple
The Tea Party crowd is as old as notions of American Manifest Destiny. They are White Nationalists, who yearn for “a time when the United States was a self-proclaimed White Man's Country.” Tea Partiers are most threatening to the cohesion and identity of the Republican Party. But they appear to have panicked some Blacks and progressives, who want “circle the wagons around the Obama administration” in the face of racist attacks.
Tea Partyers Are White Nationalists, Pure and Simple
Glen Ford

“The GOP is, at its core, a Rich Man's Party that relies for its mass support on people who want to vote for a White Man's Party.”

Corporate media go through all manner of contortions of logic and historical gymnastics to sanitize the Tea Party phenomenon – anything to avoid calling the people grouped under the Tea Party umbrella by their proper name: White nationalists. White nationalism is a taboo subject in most corporate circles – and even among some on the Left. The continued appeal of a loud and boisterous White Nationalism threatens the prevailing American mythology, shared by the likes of corporate Democrat Barack Obama and corporate Republican John McCain: the myth that racism is not endemic to American life and history.

Obama made that claim in his famous – and completely fatuous – Philadelphia campaign speech on race. Obama denounced former friend and mentor Rev. Jeremiah Wright for expressing, in the candidate's words, “ a profoundly distorted view of this country — a view that sees white racism as endemic.” But there it is, for all to see, alive and kicking in the 21st century in the form of a Tea Party “movement” in whose mouths the phrase “take back America” means return to a time when the United States was a self-proclaimed White Man's Country. The Tea Partiers need go back no farther in time than Ronald Reagan, who completed Richard Nixon's “Southern Strategy” by kicking off his 1980 presidential campaign with a speech in Philadelphia, Mississippi, a place made infamous by the murder of three civil rights workers. White Nationalist support for the Republican Party is the reason the center of GOP power lies in the states of the Old Confederacy. And it is the Republican Party that is most threatened by the White Nationalist Tea Partiers.

“The spectacle of raging White Nationalists on the march makes corporate-minded Democrats look positively leftish by comparison.”

The GOP is, at its core, a Rich Man's Party that relies for its mass support on people who want to vote for a White Man's Party. The two are not necessarily the same thing, as the White Nationalists of the GOP discovered with the bi-partisan Wall Street bailouts of 2008 and 2009. Anti-Wall Street sentiment runs deep in White Nationalist ranks, much of it rooted in anti-Semitism: the association of bankers and Jews. Republican Party leaders have good reason to fear that the Rich Man's Party is losing control of some of its most fervent White Nationalist troops.

Progressives have very different reasons to worry about the Tea Partiers. The spectacle of raging White Nationalists on the march makes corporate-minded Democrats look positively leftish by comparison. But that's an illusion. African Americans are especially susceptible to calls to “circle the wagons around the Obama administration” in the face of racist attack. Black activist Dr. Ron Daniels made just such an appeal, this week. It is a foolish, knee-jerk reaction, one that plays into the hands of the banking class and its servants in the Obama administration. Just because some neo-Confederates call President Obama racist names, does not mean Black folks should abandon demands on their own government for jobs, peace and neighborhood stability. Dr. Daniels wants Blacks and progressives to hold a march to support Obama. What we need to do is organize and agitate and march in support of our people's social and economic interests. There's a big difference between the two.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

3 comments:

Jeronimus said...

I am a White nationalist, and I would rather see the Republican party destroyed, than continue to fool those of us who want to vote for a party that works for the interests of the White American Majority. We are sick of getting screwed by immigration and affirmative action and this huge professional class of high paid multiculters such as "affirmative action officers" and "sensitivity trainers" and "civil rights lawyers," and "professors of whiteness studies." All these people are well paid to work against the interests of White Americans, and I don't see the Republicans defunding them, or kicking them out of their tenured positions, or disbarring them from the practice of law. I want nothing less.

True Christian said...

Didn't take long to bring the neo-Nazi trolls out.

Jeronimus, I know there's no getting through to an un-Christian sociopath like yourself, but you and your ilk are nothing more than useful idiots for the new world order (not to mention that your violent totalitarian ideology is blatantly un-American).

True Christian said...

By the way, how is it that you white nationalists/neo-Nazis/whatever-you-are got it into your heads that Ron Paul---a libertarian whose viewpoint was largely shaped by Jewish intellectuals and economists---speaks for you totalitarians?